p4 3.0c @ 3.7

Anything related to hardware (CPU/MoBo/Video/FSB/BIOS, etc.), hardware settings, overclocking, cooling, cool cases, case mods, hardware mods, post pics of your unique creations here.
Post Reply
User avatar
zooner
Posts: 8839
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

p4 3.0c @ 3.7

Post by zooner »

Just curious how much higher this beast is going to go! I ruined my p4 2.4c because it stuck to the hsf and deficated over 20 pins when I pulled it off. It also left my motherboard non-functional.

So, I picked up a p4 3.0c and had a gigabyte 8IG1000Pro-G laying around. I'm using 6 80mm case fans and the retail HSF. I'm also still using the standard apoxy on the retail HSF.

I'm currently running at 3.7ghz and the tempature is still running under 40C!

How fast do you think she'll go? This is crazy.

:D
Strap It On Whenever It Seems Appropriate

tomsclan.com
User avatar
loop2kil
SG Elite
Posts: 5231
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Atlanta GA

Post by loop2kil »

nice, get a prommy and go for 4.1-4.2 :)
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Impressive!

I'd like to see what my 2.8 will go to..however I don't think its possible to OC a Dell even though I just replaced the 2.0 I had in it with a 2.8 P4.
I'd like to at least push it to a 3.0 or maybe higher if it was possible.
User avatar
DKin6slay3r
Regular Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: Orlando FL.

Post by DKin6slay3r »

loop2kil wrote:nice, get a prommy and go for 4.1-4.2 :)

URL? Id like some info on this because I have the 2.4c@3.0ghz and Im stuck. The chip just wont OC anymore. Temp right now is only 28c(watercooled) and I pretty confident my memory can take a little bit more.

Currently memory is at 5:4 ratio running 200mhz

Ive had my memory up to 1:1 ratio running @ 220mhz safely
User avatar
zooner
Posts: 8839
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post by zooner »

|D|Kin6slay3r wrote:URL? Id like some info on this because I have the 2.4c@3.0ghz and Im stuck. The chip just wont OC anymore. Temp right now is only 28c(watercooled) and I pretty confident my memory can take a little bit more.

Currently memory is at 5:4 ratio running 200mhz

Ive had my memory up to 1:1 ratio running @ 220mhz safely
my 2.4 was stuck at 3.0 too. It would run at 3.1, but there were some ocassional problems at the higher speed.
Strap It On Whenever It Seems Appropriate

tomsclan.com
User avatar
DKin6slay3r
Regular Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: Orlando FL.

Post by DKin6slay3r »

Yep no matter what I've tryed it just wont go over 3.055 ghz.
:confused:
User avatar
zooner
Posts: 8839
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post by zooner »

loop2kil wrote:nice, get a prommy and go for 4.1-4.2 :)
geeze!!

I'll have to wh0re out my doggy to afford that!

:cry:
Strap It On Whenever It Seems Appropriate

tomsclan.com
User avatar
Grimson
SG Elite
Posts: 9607
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 6:55 pm

Post by Grimson »

|D|Kin6slay3r wrote:URL? Id like some info on this because I have the 2.4c@3.0ghz and Im stuck. The chip just wont OC anymore. Temp right now is only 28c(watercooled) and I pretty confident my memory can take a little bit more.

Currently memory is at 5:4 ratio running 200mhz

Ive had my memory up to 1:1 ratio running @ 220mhz safely

http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/20021230/
Crackin' skulls and breaking kneecaps.
User avatar
extreme
Posts: 2773
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 9:56 pm
Location: USA Michigan

Post by extreme »

zooner wrote:Just curious how much higher this beast is going to go! I ruined my p4 2.4c because it stuck to the hsf and deficated over 20 pins when I pulled it off. It also left my motherboard non-functional.

So, I picked up a p4 3.0c and had a gigabyte 8IG1000Pro-G laying around. I'm using 6 80mm case fans and the retail HSF. I'm also still using the standard apoxy on the retail HSF.

I'm currently running at 3.7ghz and the tempature is still running under 40C!

How fast do you think she'll go? This is crazy.

:D

If the temp is still under 40C i think you have a lot more room, you might be able to hit 3.8-3.9. What is you Vcore at?
User avatar
WickedWandy
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:01 pm

Post by WickedWandy »

doesn't oc-ing the processor, somehow inhibit the performance of the rest of the system? Or is this a guy thing, like blowing up stuff, that I wouldn't understand?
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

WickedWandy wrote:doesn't oc-ing the processor, somehow inhibit the performance of the rest of the system? Or is this a guy thing, like blowing up stuff, that I wouldn't understand?
Hello WickedWendy, and "Welcome to Speedguide" :D

Yeah, call it a guy thing. Always want to "tweak" stuff, get more power, etc. If done properly, it's usually quite safe, and usually don't damage your system, and the results are usually increased performance throughout the system. Of course there are those who must take it to the limits, and beyond...and they end up "cooking" their hardware quite often. But when done within reason, it's nice and safe.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
WickedWandy
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:01 pm

Post by WickedWandy »

:) :) :) :) :)
YeOldeStonecat wrote:Hello WickedWendy, and "Welcome to Speedguide" :D

Yeah, call it a guy thing. Always want to "tweak" stuff, get more power, etc. If done properly, it's usually quite safe, and usually don't damage your system, and the results are usually increased performance throughout the system. Of course there are those who must take it to the limits, and beyond...and they end up "cooking" their hardware quite often. But when done within reason, it's nice and safe.

Thanks StoneCat, and hey-- it's Wandy, not Wendy, lol. Seems much easier just to spend 100$ more for a faster CPU, rather than 300$ for a system that can offset the overclock. But what do I know?
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

WickedWandy wrote: :) :) :) :) :)


Thanks StoneCat, and hey-- it's Wandy, not Wendy, lol. Seems much easier just to spend 100$ more for a faster CPU, rather than 300$ for a system that can offset the overclock. But what do I know?

sometimes you can get a 200 dollar cpu to perform like the 500-800 dollar cpus, plus you end up with a higher bus speed from the overclock, a very big plus.

Other times people just enjoy it too.

its all good.
User avatar
WickedWandy
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:01 pm

Post by WickedWandy »

ok thx Yards , for a minute I was about to suggest that men often instead of being comfortable with what hardware they have, will often try to try their best to make it appear more powerful or have better performance, in many types of scenarios! :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

WickedWandy wrote: :) :) :) :) :)


Thanks StoneCat, and hey-- it's Wandy, not Wendy, lol. Seems much easier just to spend 100$ more for a faster CPU, rather than 300$ for a system that can offset the overclock. But what do I know?

Oops..my bad! :D

You don't have to spend the money for a faster CPU or system that can handle it...most of the homebuilt systems we build can already handle overclocking "out of the box".

2x examples...
1) Purchase the latest and fastest CPU that you can...and overclock it some more!
2) Say you'd like to stay on a budget. If you purchase a CPU that is one or two speeds behind the latest and greatest....you can often save a whole buncha money. Plus....you can usually overclock your CPU beyond what the latest and fastest CPU out on the market is. So it's a "Win-win" situation! :thumb:

Scenario...when I purchased and built my current 1 1/2 hours ago, the CPU is a Pentium 4 2.6C. At that time, the 3.0 was just hitting the market...and was VERY expensive. My 2.6 was very inexpensive, because it was 2x speeds below the latest. "Best bang for the buck". I immediately overclocked it to 3.12 for quite some time. Which back then.....was faster than the fastest speed Intel had out. A few months later since she proved to be running stable, I overclocked it some more to 3.38...and it's been running that speed since then. Except for one lockup I had a month or so ago, when I loaded some ATI control panel for my graphics....I had a little glitch, I lowed back to 3.12 just to test for a bit...but found it out was something else, so I'm back up to 3.38. Still darned fast for a 1.5 year old system.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
Joel
Senior Member
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: F.WV

Post by Joel »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Oops..my bad! :D

You don't have to spend the money for a faster CPU or system that can handle it...most of the homebuilt systems we build can already handle overclocking "out of the box".

2x examples...
1) Purchase the latest and fastest CPU that you can...and overclock it some more!
2) Say you'd like to stay on a budget. If you purchase a CPU that is one or two speeds behind the latest and greatest....you can often save a whole buncha money. Plus....you can usually overclock your CPU beyond what the latest and fastest CPU out on the market is. So it's a "Win-win" situation! :thumb:

Scenario...when I purchased and built my current 1 1/2 hours ago, the CPU is a Pentium 4 2.6C. At that time, the 3.0 was just hitting the market...and was VERY expensive. My 2.6 was very inexpensive, because it was 2x speeds below the latest. "Best bang for the buck". I immediately overclocked it to 3.12 for quite some time. Which back then.....was faster than the fastest speed Intel had out. A few months later since she proved to be running stable, I overclocked it some more to 3.38...and it's been running that speed since then. Except for one lockup I had a month or so ago, when I loaded some ATI control panel for my graphics....I had a little glitch, I lowed back to 3.12 just to test for a bit...but found it out was something else, so I'm back up to 3.38. Still darned fast for a 1.5 year old system.
:thumb:

It does save money. I recently aquired a 2400+ XPM for my parents and with a little 'safe' overclocking it's at 3200+ speeds. That's a $170 processor fore $77.
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.6GHz on Water | 8GB DDR2 | 2x 74GB Raptor RAID0 | 250GB Storage | P5E | 2900XT @ 850 Core | DVD-RW | 2x 24" Widescreen LCD | Saitek Eclipse | Logitech G5
User avatar
zooner
Posts: 8839
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post by zooner »

well, the 3.7 speed appears to be unstable for unknown reasons.

I've had 2 lockups in the past 48 hours, although I'm not sure it's the processor. The monitor doesnt power down, it just goes black. It doesn't do this when I push it through testing, it just happens while I'm away from the computer.

So, it's running at 3.6 to be safe for now till I figure out what happened. My first guess is that my motherboard is misrepresenting the temp's i'm running at.
Strap It On Whenever It Seems Appropriate

tomsclan.com
Post Reply