|
User Reviews/Comments:
rate:
avg:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thanks for your bull-free description. 1. I have found that using the same SSID for the APs does not work for my numerous wireless Esky indoor and outdoor surveillance IP cameras. They hang up because they seem to get confused when connecting to any of the multiple AP router with the same name. 2. The requirement of APs to be connected by wire can be alleviated if one uses Powerline adapters.
For simple less , when you use AP with same SSID with router You should sign your device with static IP address. when you near to AP , sign difference IP with IP you sign for when you near with router such , for example, router ip normally 192.168.0.1, you sign your device 192.168.0.10 when you pick router as the signal . But when you near AP device as pick AP as the signal for serve your device then your device sign IP as 192.168.0.20. You will always get your signal strength.
I also find from experience that naming the SSID the same on different bands (2.4Ghz/5.0Ghz) causes a great deal of issues too. Primarily because conventionally 2.4Ghz has a greater area coverage however there is a possibility that a 5Ghz device could momentarily be in an area that has stronger signal than the 2.4Ghz and there is a delay of 5-30 seconds for the wireless device to reconnect to the now 2.4Ghz signal that has bound in that direction stronger than the 5Ghz. Rule of thumb I use for 2.4Ghz throughout my house or any business. Keep the SSID exactly the same and then put each AP on a different Channel. So, if your wifi router is in the middle put it on channel 6, then one on channel 11 and the other on 1. Place them around 25-60 feet apart depending on the walls (pre-1970's). If you have lots of neighbor SSID you can reduce the dB gain of the outside APs to shrink the footprint of your wifi within your home/business. For 5Ghz, on Dual Band AP, name the SSID with a suffix of "-5G" and leave them in auto mode since they're least congested. The 5Ghz is an ultra high frequency, although less congested, but I typically keep wifi routers and APs no more than 60 feet apart but typically the sweet spot for great overlap and coverage is 40-50 feet.
Hey everyone,. I have a building about 300 meters long and 100 meter wide.. and I want to have wifi through the whole building with one SSID.. So I have to install a few routers but only one will be my main router... Whats the best option for the other routers? Access Point or Repeater? I was thinking Access Point because I can connect each router with a cable from a switch to my main router... If I give them all the same SSID, can I walk from beginning to end without having to reconnect to my wifi? Will t automatically connect to each access point without me noticing?
Access points (or routers set as access points) are almost always better than repeaters/extenders, as the radios can work full-time to serve clients and you get much better speeds.
If you setup a few access points(or routers set as access points) with the same SSIDs, security type, passphrase, but on different channels, this will work to cover a large area and clients will be able to connect somewhat seamlessly to either of those access points. However, what tends to happen is, you have to move away enough from an AP so the signal is not usable before the client switches to a different AP. Also, the split-second that you switch between APs may disconnect a VoIP call, for example. If you want to go a step further, and have the client pick the stronger signal even when in range of two APs, you have to buy APs with "seamless handover", a.k.a seamless handoff, seamless roaming. This is usually available only on enterprise level APs, some of the better/cheaper options out there being Ubiquiti APs. The third option is mesh networking, a few consumer devices are just hitting the market recently. I hope this helps, if you need more info or have more specific questions, please use our forums.
Hello,
I have a question. I have a router with IP 192.168.1.1 the DHCP range starts from 192.168.1.100 and ends at 192.168.1.150 and have connected it to a switch than 3 APs: Static IP 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 and 192.168.4.1 and 1 RE with IP 192.168.1.140 is it the correct way to do it or should I change the IP on the AP and what should be their values? thanks a lot
Please use our forums for questions...
Generally, if your router is at 192.168.1.1, DHCP range 192.168.1.100 +, I would keep any other static devices (such as APs) still in the 192.168.1.* range, but below the DHCP range, i.e. 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.3, etc. If you want to use other IP ranges changing the third digit (e.g. 192.168.2.1, etc.) you would put them outside the default subnet mask 255.255.255.0, so you would have to change that for every device so they can see each other. This is not necessary/advisable unless you need more than 255 internal IPs. |