|
User Reviews/Comments:
rate:
avg:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thank you. This answered my question and it was like the best one I've read yet. I think that they should introduce the 128 bit IP addresses, but that's just my opinnion, I'm sure others don't think so but what do they know? It is just a matter of time before they have to switch over becuase of how many people are now connecting to the internet and we can only hope that change comes soon. Thank you again for answering my question.
wow...cool...I really was confused about the whole thing until I read this explanation. It's a little incomplete, however. I'd like to hear more about static IPs and how they are important to servers...and why would someone at home with a standard broadband connection want to pay extra for one? Maybe I missed something, but I'd like to hear more about DHCP as well, and how that whole thing works.
great explication though!
No, static IPs are not faster than Dynamic IPs. Static or dynamic, one IP is assigned to one network device or computer. The difference is that statis IP addresses do not change, even if you remain offline for a period of time, while dynamic ones can possibly be released and assigned to someone else.
As for why someone would want to pay more for a static IP address: it is most often used to make running servers on your machine easier, not having to announce every change of your address.
on a D-link router that is conected to 7 networks and this is done by 7 outs from the router to 7 different closednet each net might have more than 2 PCs but over all nomber i detected are 17 PCs how can i by using the static and dynamic to limit the nomber of pcs at a time as some times they are large nomber and some of them uses applications that grap the speed
|