TV audio question

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

TV audio question

Post by Humboldt »

Finally picked up a 55" flat screen TV.

I have my Blu-Ray video hooked up to the TV using s-video cable.

Have the Blu-Ray hooked up with RCA cables to my (old) stereo receiver and eventually the stereo speakers and sub-woofer.
Receiver does not have HDMI.

When I watch Blu-Ray, I get audio from the stereo speakers and sub.

When I watch Netflix or USB movies, I only get audio from the TV speakers.

Do I have options for streamed/USB audio besides a long RCA cable from the TV to the receiver?

I'm planning on getting an HDMI cable from the Blu-Ray to the TV to replace the S-video, but that will only carry sound and video to the TV, correct?

I'm wondering if the HDMI cable would carry audio to the Blu-Ray, then the Blu-Ray audio to the stereo via RCA.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Do I need an HDMI audio extractor?
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Guessing I can keep things the way they are and get long RCA cables from TV to receiver with a bit of sound degradation.

Get a TV>Blu-Ray HDMI and see if it carries the audio from the BR to receiver via RCA.

Get a TV>Blu-Ray HDMI and an HDMI digital to analog converter, and RCA cables.


Get a TV>Blu-Ray optical audio and an optical audio to analog converter, and RCA cables.

Any other suggestions appreciated.
User avatar
Easto
SG Elite
Posts: 5856
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: So. California

Post by Easto »

Run HDMI from Blu-Ray > TV. Then, if the TV has a digital or optical out, I would run the TV's digital/optical out to your receiver's digital/optical in (if it has one). Even if it's an older model (receiver) it should have a coaxial digital in. Somewhere in a sub menu on your TV there should be the option to pick either the TV's internal speakers or the Receiver's.

if you need cables, buy from Monoprice.
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11703
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

The issue is that with many sources, they only output audio via one "best" output, i.e. hdmi let's say in your case to the TV. That' why, if you don't have hdmi on the receiver, you'll have to get audio "monitor" out from the TV, as Easto suggests.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Easto wrote:Run HDMI from Blu-Ray > TV. Then, if the TV has a digital or optical out, I would run the TV's digital/optical out to your receiver's digital/optical in (if it has one). Even if it's an older model (receiver) it should have a coaxial digital in. Somewhere in a sub menu on your TV there should be the option to pick either the TV's internal speakers or the Receiver's.

if you need cables, buy from Monoprice.
Receiver does not have digital or optical in.

It has coaxial in, but no reference to digital. Talking 1993 Yamaha here.

The only coax on the TV is COAX in.

Only audio output is optical audio.

Thinking of getting a DAC Digital to Analog Converter, that would take the optical audio and convert it to RCA, but it looks like most of those don't even support 5.1.

F*ck it. Despite having 3 sets of speaks and 4 sub-woofers...should I just buy a damn sound bar?
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

The Blu-Ray player does have optical in/out.

If I had the Blu-Ray hooked to the TV via HDMI, and an optical audio cable from Blu-Ray to TV also...would the audio be transmitted from the TV>the Blu-Ray>the receiver RCA audio out?

Thanks.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Recap...

New TV only has optical audio out.

Old receiver only has RCA and old school co-axial input.

Blu_Ray is hooked up to receiver via RCA and sounds good.

TV playing streaming or USB media is using TV speakers that suck.

Options for getting the TV audio to the receiver?

1) DAC Digital to Analog Converter

2) Some people say the Blu-Ray can receive and pass on the audio to the receiver...true?
If so, is that via HDMI or just the optical audio?

Thanks for the suggestions.
User avatar
TonyT
SG VIP
Posts: 10356
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Fairfax, VA

Post by TonyT »

If get a new receiver be sure to get one with hdmi pass through. All devices would connect to the receiver via hdmi and the receiver's hdmi pass through port connects to the tv. The receiver will then pass all video and audio to the tv, and the tv will pass all audio through the receiver.
http://www.samsung.com/au/support/tv-au ... s-through/
No one has any right to force data on you
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.

LRH
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11703
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

Humboldt wrote:The Blu-Ray player does have optical in/out.

If I had the Blu-Ray hooked to the TV via HDMI, and an optical audio cable from Blu-Ray to TV also...would the audio be transmitted from the TV>the Blu-Ray>the receiver RCA audio out?

Thanks.
Doesn't the TV have RCA out? The Blu-Ray will not accept audio back in, just treat it as a source.
User avatar
Easto
SG Elite
Posts: 5856
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: So. California

Post by Easto »

To be honest. I was in the same position as you about 2 years ago and is just said "screw it" and went to Best Buy and bought a new receiver that had all the connections I needed. I think it was under $200.
User avatar
Htos1
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:50 am
Location: USA

Post by Htos1 »

What Tony T said. The last a/v install I did had HDMI pass-through on the receiver, the audio system SHOULD be the base unit.
User avatar
fastchevy
SG Elite
Posts: 6966
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2001 12:00 am
Location: OKC

Post by fastchevy »

Easto wrote:Run HDMI from Blu-Ray > TV. Then, if the TV has a digital or optical out, I would run the TV's digital/optical out to your receiver's digital/optical in (if it has one). Even if it's an older model (receiver) it should have a coaxial digital in. Somewhere in a sub menu on your TV there should be the option to pick either the TV's internal speakers or the Receiver's.

if you need cables, buy from Monoprice.
I'm doing this exact same thing with the exception that my audio out on my Sharp 65" is a 3.5mm audio out that splits to RCA jacks which plug into my Yamaha receiver (probably the same year as yours or very close). Sounds good too (because it's Yamaha) ;)
.
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11703
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

Yamaha receivers are great, I've had a couple as well. I did move over to an HDMI one a few years back though.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

TonyT wrote:If get a new receiver be sure to get one with hdmi pass through. All devices would connect to the receiver via hdmi and the receiver's hdmi pass through port connects to the tv. The receiver will then pass all video and audio to the tv, and the tv will pass all audio through the receiver.
http://www.samsung.com/au/support/tv-au ... s-through/
Love my receiver. Yamaha solid state.

Not the downhill audiophile... a $20 optical cable and DAC will work fine for me.

Does sound sweet though, no pun intended.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Nope. Makes me feel old damnit.

Just optical audio out.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Easto wrote:To be honest. I was in the same position as you about 2 years ago and is just said "screw it" and went to Best Buy and bought a new receiver that had all the connections I needed. I think it was under $200.
Tempting , but I love the one I have. History and all.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

fastchevy wrote:I'm doing this exact same thing with the exception that my audio out on my Sharp 65" is a 3.5mm audio out that splits to RCA jacks which plug into my Yamaha receiver (probably the same year as yours or very close). Sounds good too (because it's Yamaha) ;)
:cheers:
User avatar
Easto
SG Elite
Posts: 5856
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: So. California

Post by Easto »

Humboldt wrote:Tempting , but I love the one I have. History and all.
I understand. I have several pieces of audio gear that my wife can't figure out why I'm still hanging onto them. But honestly, move that gear into a bedroom or den and use the new stuff with the TV. It gives you a reason to go out and purchase new gear! Check CL, you can get a HDMI enabled receiver for nothing.
User avatar
Leatherneck
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2000 12:00 am
Location: The Great Midwest

Post by Leatherneck »

I bought a really nice Yamaha RX in 1994 while living in Japan. I used it for home theater until it drove me nuts! It is now in the basement with a TV and turntable connected. After 24 years, it still sounds terrific, but I needed those HDMI and pass-through due to cable box, chromecast, firestick, Blu-ray, etc.. Bought a $249 Denon and it works great.
USMC RETIRED

Steve

Tacoma Guitar Forum
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11703
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

I like Yamaha a bit better than Denon, they just sound better to me, maybe because of better DACs imho.
User avatar
Leatherneck
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2000 12:00 am
Location: The Great Midwest

Post by Leatherneck »

Philip wrote:I like Yamaha a bit better than Denon, they just sound better to me, maybe because of better DACs imho.
Me too, but can't afford the Yamahas I want. My 24 year old Yamaha sounds leaps and bounds better than my Denon for music.
USMC RETIRED

Steve

Tacoma Guitar Forum
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Ended up with an digitaol optical audio cable>DAC box.

Sounds fine, hell of a lot better than the TV speakers at least.

Thanks for the help guys.
User avatar
Easto
SG Elite
Posts: 5856
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: So. California

Post by Easto »

Humboldt wrote:
Sounds fine, hell of a lot better than the TV speakers at least.
Nowadays, with all the advancements in movie sound reproduction 2.1, 5.1 7.1 etc, you can really make watching a movie at home a real experience. At times it can be deceiving. I remember when I had my surround system working, you would sit there thinking that maybe I spent a little too much money or went a little overboard and not really notice what the system is bringing to the table. Then, turn off the surround speakers, center speaker and woofer and the difference is staggering.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28212
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Easto wrote:Nowadays, with all the advancements in movie sound reproduction 2.1, 5.1 7.1 etc, you can really make watching a movie at home a real experience. At times it can be deceiving. I remember when I had my surround system working, you would sit there thinking that maybe I spent a little too much money or went a little overboard and not really notice what the system is bringing to the table. Then, turn off the surround speakers, center speaker and woofer and the difference is staggering.
I know, and thank you.

I'm no downhill.

Having this big ass TV, I've spent a lot more than the previous 2 hours per-year in the living room in the past week.

To me, sounds fine, I'm happy.

I'll keep it in mind though, I do love my movies loud, and good surround is awesome.

Better the sound the better the movie, maybe I've just heard too much bad surround sound.
User avatar
jeremyboycool
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Montana

Post by jeremyboycool »

The last actual T.V. I owned was I think 15 inches, when I was still a kid. I paid for it with a summer job and used it to play video games in my room. I can't imagine what those 8-bit games would look like on 55 inches, with surround sound, but I bet it would be awesome.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking
Post Reply