Windows 7 on old rig... wow fixed all lock ups.

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
tHE_0ne
Posts: 5870
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 3:10 pm
Location: Williamsburg/Norfolk VA

Windows 7 on old rig... wow fixed all lock ups.

Post by tHE_0ne »

So I put windows 7 32bit on my old rig (see specs below)

I had the worst locking up problems... XP ran smooth for years. I have changed my PSU to a different one I had around. Swapped ram with my brothers computer. Tried power options in Windows 7, as well as disabling services and changed video cards etc and countless of things.

In conclusion...

I had my screen saver set as "Blank" which caused my computer to lock up.

I hear people had headaches with even "hiding the task bar" which will cause lock ups. After 3 months of using my laptop and my desktop machine sat here as a paper weight.

Cheers

My~Rig
|Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Toledo 2.0GHz @ 2.5Ghz||ASROCK 939Dual-SATA2||OCZ Platinum 2GB (2 x 1GB) PC3200|ZALMAN 120MM CNPS7700-CU|
|ATI XT 1600 PRO|CSB SB0570 Audigy SE 7.1||WD SE16 SATA 320GB HD|Hitachi SATA 160GB HD|Thermaltake TR2 W0070 ATX 430W Power Supply |WIN 7 Ultimate| (College Budget)
User avatar
blacklab
Senior Member
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada

Post by blacklab »

Does this mean Win 7 needs less hardware than XP?

I tried Win 7 when it had the free trial and as soon as I can find one of those 3 licenses for $150 I will buy it and try it again.

My puter is getting old and needs upgrading, but I want to wait until a few more boards supporting USB 3 are available.
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

blacklab wrote:Does this mean Win 7 needs less hardware than XP?.
No, it needs more..quite a bit more. Although it can run tolerably on older P4 vintage hardware..but it really runs better with at least 2 gigs of RAM and a dual core processor.

What probably made it run better on his rig was better built in driver support, where the previous install with XP may have had early/buggy drivers. Just a guess.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

Neat.
User avatar
blacklab
Senior Member
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada

Post by blacklab »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:No, it needs more..quite a bit more. Although it can run tolerably on older P4 vintage hardware..but it really runs better with at least 2 gigs of RAM and a dual core processor.
My computer is a P4 dual core with 2 gigs of ram, but when I had the Win 7 trial version installed my HP scanner quite working. I thought it was because Win 7 did not have drivers, but after uninstalling it the scanner has not worked right. I did like how Win 7 worked.

Going to get serious and get the scanner working this week, or buy an Epson. :D
Post Reply