Your bits...

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:50 pm

http://quiz.ravenblack.net/privates.pl

Meggie · Post by **Meggie** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:52 pm

haha ew :P

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:52 pm

Spammy's bits are best described as his "immense colossus".

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:56 pm

Izzo's bits are best described as his "turgid groin-king".

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:57 pm

yardofstuf's bits are best described as his "cascading tycoon"

WTF lol

mountainman · Post by **mountainman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:59 pm

Brandon's bits are best described as his "prehensile thing".

Awesome!!

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:06 pm

Lefty's's bits are best described as his "thrusting instrument".

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:08 pm

Lefty wrote:Lefty's's bits are best described as his "thrusting instrument".

Imagine · Post by **Imagine** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:16 pm

Nice!

Imagine's bits are best described as his "stubby sky-scraper".

mountainman · Post by **mountainman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:24 pm

I'm CRYING here!!

Meggie's bits are best described as her "throbbing oyster".

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:48 pm

Jamie's bits are best described as his "gargantuan soldier".

F**kin' A

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:54 pm

Jamie_R wrote:Jamie's bits are best described as his "gargantuan soldier".

F**kin' A

mountainman · Post by **mountainman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:08 pm

Jamie_R wrote:Jamie's bits are best described as his "gargantuan soldier".

F**kin' A

Still sounds much smaller than a "stubby sky-scraper".

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:09 pm

[quote="mountainman"]Still sounds much smaller than a "stubby sky-scraper".

]

dude ... the word Gargantuan just reeks of hugeness

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:25 pm

Jamie_R wrote:dude ... the word Gargantuan just reeks of hugeness

as huge as Gargantuan might be ...i'm still "the turgid groin king"

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:25 pm

Scott's bits are best described as his "gargantuan whale".

mountainman · Post by **mountainman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:36 pm

Interesting...

Brembo's bits are best described as her "mossy opening".

Noevo's bits are best described as her "exquisite scabbard".

Ken's bits are best described as her "ravishing aperture".

Just as Spammy suspected...

thepieman · Post by **thepieman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:40 pm

ThePieMaN's bits are best described as his "one-eyed friar".

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:44 pm

thepieman wrote:ThePieMaN's bits are best described as his "one-eyed friar".

Kip Patterson · Post by **Kip Patterson** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:50 pm

Brents are best described as his "agile club"

George Bush as "deflated bishop".

Saddam Hussein as "incredible friar".

Bill Clinton as "seeping zucchini".

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:51 pm

Kip Patterson wrote:Brents are best described as his "agile club"

uh ... yeah.

gotta use 'em for 'em to be agile ...

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:52 pm

Jamie_R wrote:uh ... yeah.

gotta use 'em for 'em to be agile ...

Actually, "agile" refers to a persistent state, not one gained from any specific amount of usage.

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:19 pm

Burke wrote:Actually, "agile" refers to a persistent state, not one gained from any specific amount of usage.

well thanx for pointing that out Burke ...

loop2kil · Post by **loop2kil** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:58 pm

loop2kil's bits are best described as his "glossy sceptre".

thepieman · Post by **thepieman** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:28 pm

Kip Patterson wrote: George Bush as "deflated bishop".

BaLa · Post by **BaLa** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:20 pm

BaLa's bits are best described as his "surging spear".