what if..
- Gaming-Module
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Michigan
We would lose our gravitational field, like MM said, plus one side of the earth would get very, very cold and the other would get very, very hot, to the point of having to re-engineer our living spaces to survive. That is, if we all survive, which would be unlikely. The shift in the weather would be something with which to contend too, since the heating/cooling of the earth determines high and low pressure in the atmosphere. Also consider the effect of the sun's gravitation pulling on bodies of water. High tides would be phenomenal, who knows when they'd stop?
Of course we ghosts wouldn't have to worry about such things, since we don't abide by standard Laws of Nature or Physics.
Of course we ghosts wouldn't have to worry about such things, since we don't abide by standard Laws of Nature or Physics.
- Qwijib0
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Tucson, Arizona Processor: GenuineIntel Member #4896
Actually, we wouln't lose our gravity, as it is the earth's mass which creates it. We WOULD, however go flying off if there were a sudden stop because our momentum would propel us off. if it were a gradual slowdown, half the earth would freeze, half would burn up... and we'd still be here.
If your browser can't read unicode, you should probably switch! 
Gravity is a function of mass, totally. The spinning does in fact make the gravitational effect LESS. Centrifugal force literally translates into "center hating", centripetal, "center loving, latin terms, that I have prolly mangled. Trust me. 
Tao_Jones Cult Member since 2004
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
- Deus ex Machina
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: lost in a dream
We would suddenly become very heavy due to the loss of centrifugal force and slide along the ground at a high rate of speed from inertia. It would be very unpleasant.
"Mr President, you have big balls" - Dominica prime minister Eugenia Charles to Ronald Reagan after the invasion of Grenada, 1983
"We win and they lose. What do you think of that?" - Ronald Reagan, 1977
"We win and they lose. What do you think of that?" - Ronald Reagan, 1977
- AoDLiQuiD-M3tH
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: Connecticut
- rhcowles
- Regular Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2002 11:36 pm
- Location: Western Massachusetts
Gravity is directly proportional to the mass of the objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them. The earth is approximately 24000 miles around the equator. It completes one rotation in 24 hours. Therefore we are moving at approximately 1000mph (at the equator). We're talkin' major whiplash here if it stops suddenly. What the heck is escape velocity anyway ? I think it's less than 1000mph. So . . .
_
_
P4 1.5G 512RAM XPHome
Cel 566M 256RAM XPHome
Cel 2.0G 512RAM XPHome
P4M 3.0G 512RAM XP Pro
PPC 400M 64RAM
PS2
Thru NetGear MR814NA to cable
Cel 566M 256RAM XPHome
Cel 2.0G 512RAM XPHome
P4M 3.0G 512RAM XP Pro
PPC 400M 64RAM
PS2
Thru NetGear MR814NA to cable
23,000 mph I think...nope just checked 25,000mph.Originally posted by rhcowles
Gravity is directly proportional to the mass of the objects and inversely proportional to the distance between them. The earth is approximately 24000 miles around the equator. It completes one rotation in 24 hours. Therefore we are moving at approximately 1000mph (at the equator). We're talkin' major whiplash here if it stops suddenly. What the heck is escape velocity anyway ? I think it's less than 1000mph. So . . .
_
Tao_Jones Cult Member since 2004
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
Naw, we'd be hugging the ground at 1000 mph. There would be no escape.
Loose objects would be sliding along with us and most fixed objects would become loose objects.
I kinda hope it doesn't happen.
Loose objects would be sliding along with us and most fixed objects would become loose objects.
I kinda hope it doesn't happen.
"Mr President, you have big balls" - Dominica prime minister Eugenia Charles to Ronald Reagan after the invasion of Grenada, 1983
"We win and they lose. What do you think of that?" - Ronald Reagan, 1977
"We win and they lose. What do you think of that?" - Ronald Reagan, 1977
Now that is a damn good question. I have no idea. Thanks Brent, you can just rock me to sleep now, thats gonna keep me up thinkin. You bastid. I'm gonna find out...I must.Originally posted by Brent
what keeps the earth spinning?
Tao_Jones Cult Member since 2004
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
- Gaming-Module
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Michigan
The Earth spins constantly because of Newton's laws of motion. A body in motion will remain in motion forever unless a force acts upon it to alter or halt said motion.
This is why, I think Venus, actually has a reversed orbit when compared to other planets in our solar system. It is speculated that a large piece of space debris as large as the earth wacked into Venus on an angle against the direction of rotation.
Theoretically speaking, a large enough piece of space debris could hit us at any time at a similar angle and similarly alter our orbit.
How'd you like the sun to rise in the west and set in the east?
This is why, I think Venus, actually has a reversed orbit when compared to other planets in our solar system. It is speculated that a large piece of space debris as large as the earth wacked into Venus on an angle against the direction of rotation.
Theoretically speaking, a large enough piece of space debris could hit us at any time at a similar angle and similarly alter our orbit.
How'd you like the sun to rise in the west and set in the east?
Yes, but WHAT started that initial rotation? I'm beginning to think its the nature of gravity wells in general. The attraction(gravity) would pull objects towards one another in a straight line manner, possibly colliding, or just missing, and then start the process over, and over. In the presence of many objects, the many pulls added up would *I think* tend to be a circular motion. Seeing how the center of a circle is the same distance from its edges all the way around. The "bits" reached a state of appeasement for all the differing pulls and slowly coalesced, keeping a circular motion. Or I need to cut back on the crack.Originally posted by Macho-Module
The Earth spins constantly because of Newton's laws of motion. A body in motion will remain in motion forever unless a force acts upon it to alter or halt said motion.
Tao_Jones Cult Member since 2004
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
- Gaming-Module
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Michigan
I am assuming all motion as we know it was started by the big bang. The sun has a sort of "gravity" that has locked us and the other 8 planets into a constant elipsical orbit.
At first we were just a rock floating through space in a straight line, but one day we passed very near to the sun and the sun's gravitational field (like Black Hole's and other stars, suns DO have gravity) pulled us from our straight path into a circular orbit. Halley's comet is a good example. It is caught in the Sun's pull. (at least I think it is Halley's comet).
It is the same principal used to put satellites in orbit around the Earth. You launch the satellite at an angle into space just outside of the Earth's atmosphere, and the Earth's "pull" places that satellite into it's own orbit around Earth, thus giving the satellite free unlimited fuelless motion. The only time a satellite needs to use engine power is to move either up or down for reasons probably having to do with collision with something or to get a better signal.
The idea behind engines for the satellite are the same concept for a meteor or some other body hitting a planet on an angle. Both are forces that would forever alter our planet's motion. Except, WE dont have engine power to fix the change in trajectory.
EDIT: Wow. Astronomy class is really paying off. I knew I didnt pay $800 dollars for nothing.
*me feels fuzzy and warm*
At first we were just a rock floating through space in a straight line, but one day we passed very near to the sun and the sun's gravitational field (like Black Hole's and other stars, suns DO have gravity) pulled us from our straight path into a circular orbit. Halley's comet is a good example. It is caught in the Sun's pull. (at least I think it is Halley's comet).
It is the same principal used to put satellites in orbit around the Earth. You launch the satellite at an angle into space just outside of the Earth's atmosphere, and the Earth's "pull" places that satellite into it's own orbit around Earth, thus giving the satellite free unlimited fuelless motion. The only time a satellite needs to use engine power is to move either up or down for reasons probably having to do with collision with something or to get a better signal.
The idea behind engines for the satellite are the same concept for a meteor or some other body hitting a planet on an angle. Both are forces that would forever alter our planet's motion. Except, WE dont have engine power to fix the change in trajectory.
EDIT: Wow. Astronomy class is really paying off. I knew I didnt pay $800 dollars for nothing.
*me feels fuzzy and warm*
- Gaming-Module
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Michigan
- rhcowles
- Regular Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2002 11:36 pm
- Location: Western Massachusetts
OK . . . since escape velocity is greater than 1000mph we wouldn't go flying off into space. When the rotation stopped we would continue moving at 100mph in a straight line until acted upon by outside forces (friction and/or impact with stationary objects) slows us down or stops us. Ouch ! ! !
P4 1.5G 512RAM XPHome
Cel 566M 256RAM XPHome
Cel 2.0G 512RAM XPHome
P4M 3.0G 512RAM XP Pro
PPC 400M 64RAM
PS2
Thru NetGear MR814NA to cable
Cel 566M 256RAM XPHome
Cel 2.0G 512RAM XPHome
P4M 3.0G 512RAM XP Pro
PPC 400M 64RAM
PS2
Thru NetGear MR814NA to cable