Would it even be worth buying a new NIC for a better ping?

Networking, Wireless Routers (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax WiFi), NAT, LAN configuration, equipment, cabling, hubs, switches, and general network discussion
Post Reply
User avatar
Mirana
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:05 pm

Would it even be worth buying a new NIC for a better ping?

Post by Mirana »

Hey everyone, been reading around here and decided to sign up =)

I'm wondering if someone knows how much network cards actually do when determining pings. I have a 25mbps connection, clean computer. No extra processes running besides the mandatory ones. But I'm using a integrated realtek pcie card.

My ping from West Canada to Europe is about 217ms according to pingplotter. Any help appreciated. :thumb:
nwrickert
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Chicago suburbs

Post by nwrickert »

Unless it is badly broken, the NIC would account for less than 1 ms of ping time.
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11727
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

mwrickert is correct, for most cases NICs do not add/cause much latency. The only exception with some built-in network adapters would be if your CPU/IO/RAM resources (or upstream bandwidth) are being used to the max by some applications, it may introduce some delay.

I'd try to run a traceroute to your destination, and see which hop adds how much latency to the route.
Sometimes misplacing routers close to other devices (cable/dsl modems, sources of EMI) may introduce latency, coiled Cat5 network cables, etc.

However, latency usually adds up the path to your ISP and their backbones.

I hope this helps
Post Reply