NBC/WSJ poll: Majority would vote out every member of Congress

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

NBC/WSJ poll: Majority would vote out every member of Congress

Post by Roody »

Well there is the one thing we agree on. :D
In a country sharply divided on almost every issue, most Americans agree on one thing: they don’t like Congress, and they would vote to replace every single member -- even their own -- if they had the option.

Fifty-six percent of registered voters say they would vote out every member of Congress if there were a place on the ballot to do so. That’s the highest response in favor of the question since it was first asked in March 2010.

And they say so across the ideological spectrum – with 55 percent of liberals, 55 percent of moderates, and 58% of conservatives all feeling the same way.

“We found the one area in which all people in the country agree,” said Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted the survey with Democratic pollster Peter D. Hart.

Combine that with Congress continuing to be at near-record lows in approval at 13 percent and all members of Congress are at risk, McInturff said.

But there are also warning signs specifically for Republicans.

More people say the GOP has brought the wrong kind of change (31 percent) in Congress than the right kind (12 percent). That represents a drop for the GOP from a year ago, right after when they took control of the House as a result of the sweeping 2010 elections. In January 2011, 25 percent thought Republicans would bring the right kind of change versus 20 percent who thought they would bring the wrong kind.

Those attitudes are also far worse than right after when Democrats took control of the House in 2006 (42%/15%) and Republicans regained a majority in 1994 (37%/11%).

“People want Congress to get things done, act responsibly and fix the economy,” McInturff said, “and if they don’t,” they could be in trouble. McIntruff added, “These guys are going to be running in a head wind.”
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20 ... f-congress
User avatar
blebs
Posts: 12819
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: North Canton, Ohio

Post by blebs »

All of Washington needs to be flushed. Not just Congress. Divisions that aren't even government entities need to be flushed as well.
Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces people into thinking they can't lose. -Bill Gates
User avatar
Paft
SG Elite
Posts: 5785
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Richmond VA

Post by Paft »

I'd be behind throwing everyone out in the government right now. House, Senate, and President.
So trade that typical for something colorful, and if it's crazy live a little crazy!
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11727
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

There is a saying that comes to mind...:

If "con" is the opposite of "pro", then congress must be the opposite of progress.
User avatar
Debbie
Posts: 18148
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: New Rochelle, New York

Post by Debbie »

Philip wrote:There is a saying that comes to mind...:

If "con" is the opposite of "pro", then congress must be the opposite of progress.
:thumb:
User avatar
RaisinCain
Posts: 1941
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:11 pm

Post by RaisinCain »

Don't forget the lobbyists. :mad:
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11727
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

A responsible congress could outlaw lobbying in theory.
User avatar
blebs
Posts: 12819
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: North Canton, Ohio

Post by blebs »

Philip wrote:A responsible congress could outlaw lobbying in theory.
Yeah a "Responsible Congress" but I don't think anyone knows what that may be.
Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces people into thinking they can't lose. -Bill Gates
User avatar
Paft
SG Elite
Posts: 5785
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Richmond VA

Post by Paft »

blebs wrote:Yeah a "Responsible Congress" but I don't think anyone knows what that may be.
Well I can say one thing: It's going to be the exact opposite of what the people involved in the "occupy" movement would want!
So trade that typical for something colorful, and if it's crazy live a little crazy!
User avatar
Easto
SG Elite
Posts: 5873
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: So. California

Post by Easto »

It's us as a people who let them and everyone else get away with it. How many times have you met someone or possibly even yourself said to someone with a government job "That a good job". There seems to be an underlying current of acceptance of the fact that if you get a government job you've got if for life. That for some reason it is a kush job and you won't have to work as hard as someone in the private sector. This has to change.

For example. On TV about a year ago there was an expose' about a city worker who on company time (our tax dollars) was regularly visiting a strip joint. It tooks months and months for the city to even act let alone come to a conclusion. In the private sector... the dispatcher would have asked him to come back to the office under some false pretense and then they would be fired.

Too many public employes (City/State/National) get away with murder. They get enormous salaries and are then entrenched for life. Boot 'em all and start over again. Rewrite the rules and enforce them with a Zero Tolerance Policy.
User avatar
X-Nemesis
Advanced Member
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada

Post by X-Nemesis »

Isn't the problem deeper than Congress and the Government but as I've heard before, "Follow the Money". So no matter who get's in power, or is elected in as replacement's for all the Politicians in Washington, the root problem will still be there and that is corruption OF the government left unchecked. Does anyone honestly believe that you replace the entire government and these problems will vanish over time??? I don't think so.

It would take men and women that are not willing to be corrupted and influenced by their own personal gain.
User avatar
blebs
Posts: 12819
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: North Canton, Ohio

Post by blebs »

X-Nemesis wrote:Isn't the problem deeper than Congress and the Government but as I've heard before, "Follow the Money". So no matter who get's in power, or is elected in as replacement's for all the Politicians in Washington, the root problem will still be there and that is corruption OF the government left unchecked. Does anyone honestly believe that you replace the entire government and these problems will vanish over time??? I don't think so.

It would take men and women that are not willing to be corrupted and influenced by their own personal gain.
Not so long as George Soros and company have their say and play in the matter.
Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces people into thinking they can't lose. -Bill Gates
Post Reply