check my result pls ( new isp )

Get help and discuss anything related to tweaking your internet connection, as well as the different tools and registry patches on the site. TCP Optimizer settings and Analyzer results should be posted here.
Post Reply
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

check my result pls ( new isp )

Post by llj143 »

-speed: 1.5 mbps
- modem: webstar dpc2100r2
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 12.14.2009 21:48
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405ac0103030001010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 65340 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 65340
Recommended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104, 1022208
BDP limit (200ms): 2614kbps (327KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1045kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 50
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
are the results okay?

actually im having ping isues, my ping goes up while playing online and watching youtube at the same time
User avatar
mccoffee
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Post by mccoffee »

watching streaming video is one of the worse things to do since broadcast traffic and creates a broadcast storm quit doing both at the same time you will be arlight
Comptia a+ n+
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

is there anychance to fix it?

thanks
User avatar
akbarri
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Caterpillar Inc

Post by akbarri »

nothing, everything is good :thumb:
like mccofee sayed "dont do it both (playing online + watching u tube) @ same time"
will caused traffic = high ping!!

or u can buy 10Mbps connection :D

# OS: Windows, Linux # Browser: Blink, Gecko, Presto, Webkit + Squid + Bind
User avatar
mccoffee
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Post by mccoffee »

There is another thing you can try either using quailty of service ,or a program called net limiter both are free if i'm not mistaken. you could use either or to limit the amount of traffic you and bother uses that way it won't bog so much.

A hardware soluation would be is getting a rotuer that supports qos and amybe a switch the switch would put your bother on another network plus it would help with network collasions. There could be a few routers that may have some other types fuctions they could do the same as the switch.

Either or use a router to hadle qos and traffic shapping or just use xp/vista/7 to handle it or net limiter or use a little of both your call.
Comptia a+ n+
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

i see.. actually i hav 2 pc connectd to 1 intrnet connection, is there a program i can use to set its limit speed to 1 computer? lyk the pc can only get a limit speed of 1mb insted 2mb
User avatar
mccoffee
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Post by mccoffee »

there is qos that could traffic shape and be useful built into xp/vista/7 and the servers another program is called net limiter.

net limiter might be easier to setup though if you sre newer but if you want to use a free way qos can do it though but may require some more steps though.
Comptia a+ n+
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

ok thanks, will check that out later :)

okay right now i've install a router ( TL-R402M ), when i do the analyzer here's my result

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 12.25.2009 09:46
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b40103030001010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65340 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 65340
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2614kbps (327KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1045kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
User avatar
mccoffee
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Post by mccoffee »

TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - uncheck
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU - 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 64240
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - unchecked
Timestamps - uncheck

Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 10
LocalPriority - 5
Host Priority - 6
DNSPriority - 7
NetbtPriority - 8
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
__________________
Comptia a+ n+
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

PPPoe check or uncheck?
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

llj143 wrote:PPPoe check or uncheck?
Uncheck. Fill in 1500 manually for MTU.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

how's this?
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 12.25.2009 23:23
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b401010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65535 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 65535
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2621kbps (328KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1049kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

Rerun the settings given by Mccoffee. When done correctly, TCP Window should become 64240.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

ok.. how's this now?
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 12.25.2009 23:54
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b401010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 64240 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2570kbps (321KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1028kbps (128KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

llj143 wrote:ok.. how's this now?
TCP settings are now correct.

Point to note is that your connection is through a proxy. Do not know if this proxy belongs to your ISP.

Go to Internet Options -> connection

and make sure your browser is not connected through any proxy.

IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

this is what looks like in internet options > connection

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6149/57378219.jpg

and under LAN settings is

automatically detect settings ( unchecked )
Proxy server ( unchecked )
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

llj143 wrote:this is what looks like in internet options > connection

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6149/57378219.jpg

and under LAN settings is

automatically detect settings ( unchecked )
Proxy server ( unchecked )
Then your ISP is using a web proxy to cache frequent websites of its members to speed up page downloads. No effect on your connection speed.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

okay, thanks trogers :)
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

hi guys, im back again, i just reformatted my computer and installed a fresh windows 7. here's my result
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 01.03.2010 10:35
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows 7

TCP options string: 020405b40103030201010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65700 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2 bits (2^2=4)
Unscaled RWIN : 16425
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2628kbps (329KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1051kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 106
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
- by the way 2 computers are connected through router, other computer is using windows xp
- and also under Disable unnecessary services in "Tips" can i use that also in win7?

thanks
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

llj143 wrote:hi guys, im back again, i just reformatted my computer and installed a fresh windows 7. here's my result



- by the way 2 computers are connected through router, other computer is using windows xp
- and also under Disable unnecessary services in "Tips" can i use that also in win7?

thanks
The patch for Vista/Win 7 should cover most of the tweaks. Run it twice, first with y and then with q

http://www.speedguide.net/faq_in_q.php? ... 42&qid=302
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

ok i ran the patch, restart my computer and this is the result
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 01.03.2010 11:10
IP address: 121.97.xx.xxx(proxy:121.97.59.62)
Client OS: Windows 7

TCP options string: 020405b40103030201010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65700 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2 bits (2^2=4)
Unscaled RWIN : 16425
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2628kbps (329KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1051kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

RWIN Scaling: 2 bits (2^2=4)

As long as RWIN is not zero, autotuning is working normally.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
llj143
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by llj143 »

so the results are ok now? :)
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

llj143 wrote:so the results are ok now? :)
Yes, results are okay.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
Post Reply