Senate rejects law on carrying concealed weapons

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Senate rejects law on carrying concealed weapons

Post by Roody »

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate narrowly rejected a measure to allow people to carry concealed weapons from state to state Wednesday.

The vote was 58 to 39. The amendment needed 60 votes to pass.

The measure, which split Democrats, would have required each of the 48 states that allow concealed firearms to honor permits issued in other states.

Supporters of the measure argued it would help deter criminals; opponents claimed it would endanger innocent people by effectively forcing most of the country to conform to regulations in states with the loosest gun ownership standards.

Sen. John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican who is a co-sponsor of the amendment, argued Wednesday that gun licenses should apply across state lines, like driver's licenses.

"People travel," he said on CNN's "American Morning."

"We have truck drivers on our roads, people traveling for vacation in their vehicles, and if you have a license... you should be able to use that license in other states. It should apply like a driver's license," he said.

He argued that concealed weapons deter crime.

But Republican Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City and an opponent of the law, said the proposed amendment would trample on states' rights.

"Wyoming shouldn't be subject to New York state laws, and we're going in that direction," he said. "What's right for the people of Wyoming isn't necessarily right for the people of New York and vice versa."

Bloomberg insisted that guns do not make people safer.

"There's no evidence that if you have a gun, you're safer. Quite the contrary. If you have a gun at home, [you are] something like 20 times more likely to have somebody in your house killed," he said on "American Morning."

"We have to protect our policemen, protect our citizens. We can't have all these guns, and it's reasonable to have each state make their own laws," he said.

The issue has blurred Capitol Hill's usual partisan lines. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, is one of several Southern and Western Democrats who supported the measure. Others Democrats opposed it.

The full Senate vote came in the form of an amendment to a larger defense appropriations bill.

For gun control advocates, the fight over the proposal was the latest in a series of unexpected setbacks since the start of the Obama administration.

In May, President Obama signed a credit card bill that included a provision allowing people to carry guns in national parks.

Another bill that would have given the District of Columbia's representative in Congress full voting rights stalled earlier in the year after Senate Republicans attached a provision that would have eased tight gun controls in the district.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/22/ ... index.html
User avatar
tarpoon75
Advanced Member
Posts: 678
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: NorthCarolina

Post by tarpoon75 »

Slack.

Although, I can see how cities like D.C. and NYC would not want this. But these are registered citizens who are not likely to turn to criminal offenses.

I'd be curious to see how many Senators/Congressmen carry in the face of "state rights" who don't honor CCWs.
Now, Hank, touch your throat. That tube you feel is your trachea. Think of it as your handle. That thing your thumb is on is your carotid artery. Think of it as your button. I want you to grab the handle, push the button.
-Brock Samson
User avatar
blebs
Posts: 12819
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2000 12:00 am
Location: North Canton, Ohio

Post by blebs »

I still think it should have passed. These people are not ordinary, everyday, folks. They've been fingerprinted, background checked, trained and certified to conceal carry. Why shouldn't they be allowed to conceal carry in states that allow it?
Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces people into thinking they can't lose. -Bill Gates
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

blebs wrote:I still think it should have passed. These people are not ordinary, everyday, folks. They've been fingerprinted, background checked, trained and certified to conceal carry. Why shouldn't they be allowed to conceal carry in states that allow it?
I agree, even though I disagree with both sides points on why it should/shouldn't be allowed. LOL
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

blebs wrote:I still think it should have passed. These people are not ordinary, everyday, folks. They've been fingerprinted, background checked, trained and certified to conceal carry. Why shouldn't they be allowed to conceal carry in states that allow it?
I agree with this 100%.... it will come up again and pass most likely next time. But doesn't matter I have mine here in Virginia and I can already take my gun with me to many states surrounding me as they allow per a thing they locked in with each other.
User avatar
MadDoctor
New Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Looks dark

Post by MadDoctor »

blebs wrote:These people are not ordinary, everyday, folks.
*then there is me*
blebs wrote:They've been fingerprinted, background checked, trained and certified to conceal carry. Why shouldn't they be allowed to conceal carry in states that allow it?
*...and yet I carry a gun. Go figure*

:D
People will forget what you said... and people will forget what you did... but people will never forget how you made them feel.
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

MadDoctor wrote:*then there is me*



*...and yet I carry a gun. Go figure*

:D
That lil' thang in yer pants? Peh...Derringer.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
MadDoctor
New Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Looks dark

Post by MadDoctor »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:That lil' thang in yer pants? Peh...Derringer.
Last night you were saying it was a cannon.
People will forget what you said... and people will forget what you did... but people will never forget how you made them feel.
User avatar
JawZ
Posts: 21941
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 12:00 am

Post by JawZ »

MadDoctor wrote:Last night you were saying it was a cannon.

Interesting....

[IMGO]http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x17/ ... C00353.jpg[/IMGO]
User avatar
MadDoctor
New Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Looks dark

Post by MadDoctor »

JawZ wrote:Interesting....
:rotfl: :rotfl:
People will forget what you said... and people will forget what you did... but people will never forget how you made them feel.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

JawZ wrote:Interesting....
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

MadDoctor wrote:Last night you were saying it was a cannon.
From a 2" toy soldiers set
:D

Image
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Post Reply