Unbelievable

tr87526 · Post by **tr87526** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:38 pm

Saw the on the show "The Soup". I couldn't believe it was real so I googled it.

Check out the link:

http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2008 ... wee-p1.php

happyday999 · Post by **happyday999** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:48 am

That's interesting...

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:02 am

happyday999 wrote:That's interesting...

no, that is stupid

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:13 am

LOL I saw this too...I DVR the soup every week and yeah thats just stupid! I'm curious as to even sells it in the US?

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:19 am

Gixxer wrote:no, that is stupid

I tend to agree. IMO, that is a bit much.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:36 am

Oh goodness, an anatomically correct doll. We're doomed.

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:41 am

Izzo wrote:Oh goodness, an anatomically correct doll. We're doomed.

not only anatomically correct, the damn thing moves

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:51 am

Izzo wrote:Oh goodness, an anatomically correct doll. We're doomed.

If ever there was a response that made it obvious you don't have kids this would be one.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:58 am

Roody wrote:If ever there was a response that made it obvious you don't have kids this would be one.

edit> You never cease to amaze with your insight, Roody. Well done.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:59 am

Gixxer wrote:not only anatomically correct, the damn thing moves

It usually does when they pee. I take you've never been pissed on whilst changing a diaper?

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:59 am

Izzo wrote:

I didn't mean any disrespect with that. My point was that I have no problems teaching my kids about sex when the time comes, but I can't say I want to be answering questions that my daughter might have when she sees a boy doll's dick move right before peeing.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:01 am

Roody wrote:

I didn't mean any disrespect with that. My point was that I have no problems teaching my kids about sex when the time comes, but I can't say I want to be answering questions that my daughter might have when she sees a boy doll popping wood right before peeing.

What are you afraid of? The truth?

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:02 am

Izzo wrote:What are you afraid of? The truth?

Not at all. This is the part though where I believe you have to have a kid to understand. There is a time and place for that stuff, but imo this situation creates more problems then it's worth.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:04 am

I try to hold up my hand just in case to avoid the random stream.. Once was enough

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:06 am

Roody wrote:Not at all. This is the part though where I believe you have to have a kid to understand. There is a time and place for that stuff, but imo this situation creates more problems then it's worth.

What kind of "problems"? That a boy has a penis and a girl has a vagina?

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:08 am

Izzo wrote:What kind of "problems"? That a boy has a penis and a girl has a vagina?

Again there is a time and place for everything. Putting those things on the market can force parents to have discussions before the time is ready. As I stated once you have a little Izzo you will see what I mean.

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:13 am

Izzo wrote:It usually does when they pee. I take you've never been pissed on whilst changing a diaper?

name the last doll you have seen that has a moving penis

as far as changing diapers ...

i raised and changed 3 of my younger brothers diapers ... never got peed on much though due to i was a fast learner after the first couple times and learned i did not like to get peed on and to cover it up

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:14 am

Roody wrote:Again there is a time and place for everything. Putting those things on the market can force parents to have discussions before the time is ready. As I stated once you have a little Izzo you will see what I mean.

agreed. the conversation has to be had when they are mature enough and sometimes the age can differ when that time arrives

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:26 am

Roody wrote:Again there is a time and place for everything. Putting those things on the market can force parents to have discussions before the time is ready. As I stated once you have a little Izzo you will see what I mean.

Oh, Roody, I do understand and you still haven't answered my question. What problems? Please be specific.

Are you saying I just picked out random images of kids for my gallery pics? The mailman has been hanging around a lot lately. Maybe I should be worried.....

Y'see this is where I feel you just kind of let things go in one ear and out the other ...or you see them but don't actually know what you're looking at.

Don't forget to be specific.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:43 pm

Izzo wrote:Oh, Roody, I do understand and you still haven't answered my question. What problems? Please be specific.

Are you saying I just picked out random images of kids for my gallery pics? The mailman has been hanging around a lot lately. Maybe I should be worried..... Y'see this is where I feel you just kind of let things go in one ear and out the other ...or you see them but don't actually know what you're looking at.

Don't forget to be specific.

Izzo in your hurry to offer up a rebuttal you apparently didn't comprehend the fact I already addressed the problem I was speaking of. That problem was it can force parents to address issues before they feel the time is ready regarding their children. Also, don't tell me you understand when you clearly don't. You are not a parent so don't act like you have the kind of experience that could make you possibly understand.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:49 pm

Roody wrote:If ever there was a response that made it obvious you don't have kids this would be one.

I thought izzo had a kid?

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm

Roody wrote:Izzo in your hurry to offer up a rebuttal you apparently didn't comprehend the fact I already addressed the problem I was speaking of. That problem was it can force parents to address issues before they feel the time is ready regarding their children. Also, don't tell me you understand when you clearly don't. You are not a parent so don't act like you have the kind of experience that could make you possibly understand.

Again if you go back and look at my last reply before this one I clearly stated that what the problem was.

What issues? Are you saying explaining the differences between boy parts and girl parts is a problem? Clearly the problem is yours being uncomfortable in discussing the differences between boys and girls rather than the doll itself. Explain to me why you feel I'm not a parent. How old are your children?

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:I thought izzo had a kid?

Apparently I lost two of them recently.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:55 pm

Izzo wrote:What issues? Are you saying explaining the differences between boy parts and girl parts is a problem? Clearly the problem is yours being uncomfortable in discussing the differences between boys and girls rather than the doll itself. Explain to me why you feel I'm not a parent. How old are your children?

The problem is maturity or a lack thereof. A parent (Doesn't matter who) should have the right to choose when the time is right to discuss sex or in this case boy/girl parts. Throwing an anatomically correct doll out onto the open market is certainly well within the rights of the company making it, but that's not the point I am arguing. What I am saying is it creates a problem for parents for the reason I just stated.

Izzo wrote:Explain to me why you feel I'm not a parent.

That reply right there being one. God knows it's well within your nature to actually dodge the question of whether you are or not, but no parent would reply like that. Again it's an example of things you would understand if you were actually a parent.

Randy · Post by **Randy** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:59 pm

In the grand spectrum of what kids say and do, It ( the pee pee doll) is just not that emotionally scarring. The doll could cause a bit of potty mouth at the most which kids manage to develop at some point in their social exposures or another unless completely shrouded in a religous Vail of ignorance

Kids run around saying pee face and poo poo face all the time I would say mtv booty videos are way worse.

I have kids, they play with toy guns and pretend to shoot dolls in the genitals. I blame TF2

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:59 pm

Roody wrote:The problem is maturity or a lack thereof. A parent (Doesn't matter who) should have the right to choose when the time is right to discuss sex or in this case boy/girl parts. Throwing an anatomically correct doll out onto the open market is certainly well within the rights of the company making it, but that's not the point I am arguing. What I am saying is it creates a problem for parents for the reason I just stated.

That reply right there being one. God knows it's well within your nature to actually dodge the question of whether you are or not, but no parent would reply like that. Again it's an example of things you would understand if you were actually a parent.

See, this is your problem. Explaining the difference between boy parts and girl parts in no way, shape or form is related to sex. I'm sorry you feel that way.

Why wouldn't a parent respond like that? Ah, you mean religious people. Gotcha.

Psst. You're crystal ball is broked.....

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:01 pm

Izzo wrote:Apparently I lost two of them recently.

Maybe they're at Russell's scooping out his laundry detergent!

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:01 pm

Izzo wrote:Why wouldn't a parent respond like that? Ah, you mean religious people. Gotcha.

No I didn't mean religious people. Nice attempt at doing two things. First, putting words in my mouth and then second not actually addressing your attempt at implying you are a parent. God knows you have a way with words Izzo.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:02 pm

Roody wrote:The problem is maturity or a lack thereof. A parent (Doesn't matter who) should have the right to choose when the time is right to discuss sex or in this case boy/girl parts. Throwing an anatomically correct doll out onto the open market is certainly well within the rights of the company making it, but that's not the point I am arguing. What I am saying is it creates a problem for parents for the reason I just stated.

But then you face the same problem, "Daddy home this doll isnt the same as me? Am I br0kenz?

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:03 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:But then you face the same problem, "Daddy home this doll isnt the same as me? Am I br0kenz?

Yet another example of my point. Thanks YoS.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:04 pm

Roody wrote:No I didn't mean religious people. Nice attempt at doing two things. First, putting words in my mouth and then second not actually addressing your attempt at implying you are a parent. God knows you have a way with words Izzo.

Putting words into your mouth? You took my kids away from me

Is Ken around to help explain this to you?

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:04 pm

Roody wrote:Yet another example of my point. Thanks YoS.

Right, ignore the "problem" it'll go away.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:04 pm

Roody wrote:Yet another example of my point. Thanks YoS.

So then all dolls are evil? I've confused myself now...

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:04 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Maybe they're at Russell's scooping out his laundry detergent!

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:05 pm

Izzo wrote:Putting words into your mouth? You took my kids away from me

Thats almost sig worthy lol

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:09 pm

Ok, I will explain the issue one last time since the obvious doesn't seem so obvious. If a parent doesn't want to address sex or sexual organs with their children until they feel they are of the right maturity then this throws a bit of a crimp into things. That doesn't mean I am suggesting ignoring the problem as I clearly am not. I am simply stating a parent wants the right to choose when they believe their child is mature enough.

If that is still a point you two (Izzo and YoS) don't understand then take it up with someone else. Personally I don't buy into the fact you don't understand what is being said. I do however believe you are once again Izzo attempting to cause trouble.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:11 pm

Roody wrote:Ok, I will explain the issue one last time since the obvious doesn't seem so obvious. If a parent doesn't want to address sex or sexual organs with their children until they feel they are of the right maturity then this throws a bit of a crimp into things. That doesn't mean I am suggesting ignoring the problem as I clearly am not. I am simply stating a parent wants the right to choose when they believe their child is mature enough.

If that is still a point you two (Izzo and YoS) don't understand then take it up with someone else. Personally I don't buy into the fact you don't understand what is being said. I do however believe you are once again Izzo attempting to cause trouble.

So, the problems are yours and not with the doll? Got it. Thanks.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:12 pm

Roody wrote:If that is still a point you two (Izzo and YoS) don't understand then take it up with someone else. Personally I don't buy into the fact you don't understand what is being said. I do however believe you are once again Izzo attempting to cause trouble.

All I'm saying is that the question can come up either way.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:13 pm

Izzo wrote:So, the problems are yours and not with the doll? Got it. Thanks.

No I did not say that. Clearly since you have the ability to read you understand that.

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:16 pm

Roody wrote:No I did not say that. Clearly since you have the ability to read you understand that.

Your response proves it.

See what I did there?