_______________________________________________ Vendor neutral certified in IT Project Management, IT Security, Cisco Networking, Cisco Security, Wide Area Networks, IPv6, IT Hardware, Unix, Linux, and Windows server administration
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
About 120 gigs of music data, mostly from CDs of mine that I've ripped in the past month or so.
And as luck would have it, I was having one of those "You know, I should probably make a backup of this stuff...just in case..." moments not that long ago.
I'm currently flipping a coin on whether I should grab the sledgehammer, or the really, really big sledgehammer.
Amro wrote:right, because that's MUCH less likely to fail than an internal one.
You see.... it's EX - TER - NAL ......which means that it isn't IN-TER-NAL ...which means that it's outside of the the 'puter thingy and therefore not IN-SIDE.....which means that y'know ...it works.....'n stuff .....yeah.
Amro wrote:right, because that's MUCH less likely to fail than an internal one.
yeah...? I turn it on when I back stuff up and turn it back off...
no sense in running it and wearing it down to make it crash sooner when its not being used.
Been sitting here for 2hours and have had 3 students come in with harddrives that have failed over night.. it happens. Its amazing that all 3 of them had "external" hard drives to back their stuff up on and saved the day!
raid is not a back solution, at least that is what i have been lead to believe, burn that data to dvd/cd and make multiple copies to multiple external HDD's.
at least that's what i do, but i am kinda paranoid of losing some things.
Mark wrote:raid is not a back solution, at least that is what i have been lead to believe, burn that data to dvd/cd and make multiple copies to multiple external HDD's.
While I'm not all that familiar with RAID myself, I'm under the impression that a setup like RAID 1 is basically creating a mirror of your data on a second hard drive. IE, two 300 gig HDs give you 300 gigs of usable space, with a 300 gig duplicate in case of drive failure.
I do burn backups to DVD, but I hadn't gotten around to tackling that drive (or any of the drives in that machine) yet.
raid is not a back solution, at least that is what i have been lead to believe, burn that data to dvd/cd and make multiple copies to multiple external HDD's.
at least that's what i do, but i am kinda paranoid of losing some things.
the real solution is amazon s3.
sava: external hard drives are NOT more reliable than internal ones -- it's just a second copy on the same volatile media. your anecdotal examples don't change this fact.