Windows SMP client is now open beta test

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:32 am

http://forum.folding-community.org/ftopic18531.html

for you folks with dual/quad core rigs that want some serious points added to your scores.

found the info here

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1169821

here are the points for these clients.....
Project 2610: 1523 points, deadline 4 days
Project 2651: 1760 points, deadline 4 days
Project 2652: 1148 points, deadline 3 days

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:27 pm

I'm trying it now. 100% usage.

Looking good.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:36 pm

This normal?

[17:26:39] Preparing to commence simulation
[17:26:39] - Looking at optimizations...
[17:26:39] - Created dyn
[17:26:39] - Files status OK
[17:26:47] - Expanded 3605025 -> 21619596 (decompressed 599.7 percent)
[17:26:47] - Starting from initial work packet
[17:26:47]
[17:26:47] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 80, Gen 0)
[17:26:47]
[17:26:47] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[17:26:47] Entering M.D.
[17:27:04] tial work pa- Starting from initial work packet
[17:27:04]
[17:27:04] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 80, Gen 0)
[17:27:04]
[17:27:04] Entering M.D.
[17:27:10] Rejecting checkpoint
[17:29:10] ILE_IO_ERROR
[17:29:10] Finalizing output

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:42 pm

i don't know, i tried to run it this AM and got errors as well, i know this SMP deal doesn't like overclocking much, really show errors if there is a hint of instability, had the similar issues with the VM client on really big work units

maybe try reducing you CPU clock some ?

here is the error i got this AM........

Code: Select all

[12:30:02] Preparing to commence simulation
[12:30:02] - Ensuring status. Please wait.
[12:30:07] - Starting from initial work packet
[12:30:07] 
[12:30:07] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 51, Gen 0)
[12:30:07] 
[12:30:09] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[12:30:09] Entering M.D.
[12:30:27] .7 percent)
[12:30:28] - Starting from initial work packet
[12:30:28] 
[12:30:28] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 51, Gen 0)
[12:30:28] 
[12:30:35] Entering M.D.
[12:30:41] Rejecting checkpoint
[12:30:43] Protein: Protein
[12:30:43] Writing local files
[12:30:44] Extra SSE boost OK.
[12:30:44] Writing local files
[12:30:44] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[12:52:36]  data to disk...
[12:52:36]   ... Done.
[12:52:36] - FaNo C.P. to delete.
[12:52:36] - Failed to delete work/wudata_02.bed
[12:52:36] - Failed to del- Failed to delete work/wudata_02.bed
[12:52:36] - Failed to delete work/wudata_02.sas
[12:52:36] - Failed to delete work/wudata_02.goe
[12:52:36] Warning:  check for stray files
[12:52:36] g output
[12:54:36] home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[12:54:36] Finalizing output

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:45 pm

Stock speed right now, its still at 100% cpu usage so I'll let it keep going.

EDIT: It be trouble, posted on the offical forum.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:20 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Stock speed right now, its still at 100% cpu usage so I'll let it keep going.

EDIT: It be trouble, posted on the offical forum.

it working for ya yet ?

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:25 pm

Mark wrote:it working for ya yet ?

Yup, deleted the entire fah folder, reinstalled, on the reinstall I left indicated memory alone and advmethods off, all good.

28 mins a frame. Your results?

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:34 pm

i was getting errors this morning so i shut it down, this evening i deleted the work folder and the queue file and tried it again, getting about 26minutes per frame @ 2.50Ghz

Code: Select all

23:12:24] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[23:12:24] Version 1.74 (March 10, 2007)
[23:12:24] 
[23:12:24] Preparing to commence simulation
[23:12:24] - Looking at optimizations...
[23:12:24] .
[23:12:31] - Starting from initial work packet
[23:12:31] 
[23:12:31] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 51, Gen 0)
[23:12:31] 
[23:12:35] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[23:12:35] Entering M.D.
[23:12:48] .7 percent)
[23:12:48] - Starting from initial work packet
[23:12:48] 
[23:12:48] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 51, Gen 0)
[23:12:48] 
[23:12:52] Entering M.D.
[23:12:58] Rejecting checkpoint
[23:13:00] Protein: Protein
[23:13:00] Writing local files
[23:13:01] Extra SSE boost OK.
[23:13:02] Writing local files
[23:13:02] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[23:38:45] Writing local files
[23:38:45] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[00:04:17] Writing local files
[00:04:17] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[00:30:09] Writing local files
[00:30:10] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:24 pm

one other thing, when i woke up this AM, i had a nice blue screen on this PC, not sure if it was the beta deal or what, so i am back to running 2 regular clients for now.

might try and clock my PC a bit lower and see what happens later.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:12 pm

so far so good

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:28 pm

Yup! nice point boost there!

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:23 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Yup! nice point boost there!

ya run it for a few weeks and you will really like it, when i was using that VMware deal, i was getting about 7K -8K per week with all my PCs together, now back down to about 4K per week.

btracy · Post by **btracy** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:21 pm

I am pretty excited about trying this but I am going to wait until after beta likely.

I have a dual quad core Xeon I just put the fah client(s) on and it would be nice to run fewer instances. I can only run FAH on this box about 12 hours a day but that is better than nothing.

I am getting 3 new core2 duo's here as well. Maybe I will try it out on my personal box before putting it on the other 2 (SMP that is since FAH is going on them all SMP or not :P) Maybe I will throw it on my X2 4400+ at home to try out as well.

Brad

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:33 pm

Another Btracy post!

nice list of new boxes there. I have it on my 4400+ Install can be a little annoying as stonecat is finding out. lol

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:34 pm

2nd wu finished, wont connect to assignment server now

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:52 pm

Assignment server is back up

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:55 pm

ya them big points deals are nice, congrats

goobee · Post by **goobee** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:42 pm

Not too hot on this, you need to load .net 2.0 to run it.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:45 pm

goobee wrote:Not too hot on this, you need to load .net 2.0 to run it.

.net 2.0 is fine, whats your beef with it? A bunch of good apps I wouldnt be able to run without it.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:46 pm

Oh yeah and goobster! Good to see ya around!

How have things been going?

goobee · Post by **goobee** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:08 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:.net 2.0 is fine, whats your beef with it? A bunch of good apps I wouldnt be able to run without it.

I'm just a little anti-MS at the moment. Last I heard, .net framework was supposed to be open source. Then I heard MS patented patented certain parts of it. How can it be open source if parts of it is restricted? My understanding could be wrong though.

goobee · Post by **goobee** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:09 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Oh yeah and goobster! Good to see ya around!

How have things been going?

Not bad, how 'bout yourself?

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:15 pm

goobee wrote:I'm just a little anti-MS at the moment. Last I heard, .net framework was supposed to be open source. Then I heard MS patented patented certain parts of it. How can it be open source if parts of it is restricted? My understanding could be wrong though.

I dunno, but I know without .net 2.0 I wouldnt be able to use paint.net, or Amro's programs, and now SMP fah

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:16 pm

goobee wrote:Not bad, how 'bout yourself?

Good as well

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:52 pm

goobee wrote:Not too hot on this, you need to load .net 2.0 to run it.

oh come on goobee, don't be a sissy, let's see what that quad core rig can do, of course ya need "the_snake" for a user name to make it count

anyways, good to see ya posting here again