Help Me Plz.......

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:02 am

HELP ME TWEAK AGAIN..........30000/5000 OPTIMUM BOOST......THANK`!!!

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 01.11.2007 02:00
IP address: 24.184.xxx.xxx

TCP options string: 020405b40103030301010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 513920 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 3
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Reccomended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920
BDP limit (200ms): 20557kbps (2570KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 8223kbps (1028KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 56
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:13 am

Max. Latency = RWIN x 8 / Bandwidth = 513920 x 8 / 30000 = 137ms

What speed are you getting now? Your present setting would get you close to your capped speed if your working latency is not more than 130ms.

If your present speed is much lower than capped, then it may be due either to higher working latency (problem in signal quality) or the presence of spyware/malware.

Do this nitro test and post the report under the 'Statistics' button:

http://nitro.ucsc.edu/

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:56 am

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 1.15Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 13.63Mb/s

------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_10

------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
45 Mbps T3/DS3 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 134.88 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and
There were 33 packets retransmitted, 315 duplicate acks received, and 330 SACK blocks received
The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time
C2S throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 1.04%
S2C throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 0.43%
This connection is network limited 99.83% of the time.

Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON

Server 'nitro.ucsc.edu' is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port was successful]
Client is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port was successful]
Packet size is preserved End-to-End
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

any help???

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:13 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:[
WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 1.15Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 13.63Mb/s

------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_10

------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
45 Mbps T3/DS3 link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 134.88 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and
There were 33 packets retransmitted, 315 duplicate acks received, and 330 SACK blocks received
The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time
C2S throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 1.04%
S2C throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 0.43%
This connection is network limited 99.83% of the time.

Server 'nitro.ucsc.edu' is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port was successful]
Client is not behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port was successful]
Packet size is preserved End-to-End
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End

Your working latency (round trip time) is only 135ms, within the max. latency of the RWIN setting. Thus signal quality is not an issue.

The test indicates your comp is running background traffic during the test (other network traffic) and your speed is less than half of capped. There is possibility your comp has some spyware/malware limiting speed.

Download and update Spybot and Lavasoft Ad-Aware. You can search Google for the latest links. Then go into Windows 'Safe Mode' and scan and remove them. To get into 'Safe Mode', reboot comp and when booting, press F5 and choose mode.

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:35 am

no change...............i have ad aware and spybot~~~i did a scan in safe mode,but found nothing.(this is a new machine, brand new installed XP,tweak the system with indication from your reply in my prewiew post)all driver and update installed, so there shouldn't be any craps in it), but thanks anyway, you do a great job.

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:40 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:no change...............i have ad aware and spybot~~~i did a scan in safe mode,but found nothing.(this is a new machine, brand new installed XP,tweak the system with indication from your reply in my prewiew post)all driver and update installed, so there shouldn't be any craps in it), but thanks anyway, you do a great job.

Check if you have installed the latest Windows updates.

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:54 am

damit~!!!!i thoght i update it alreay~~~there are xxx numbers of update~!!let me do it~~~reply with result~!

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:13 am

still no change..........

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:27 am

After updating Windows, reboot comp to take effect.

Let's see if doubling the RWIN gives any changes.

Use these settings with TCP Optimizer:

General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU - 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 1027840
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck

Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:07 am

hmmmmmmm~~~~speed at speedtest become very unstable, and speed have lower down.

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:51 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:hmmmmmmm~~~~speed at speedtest become very unstable, and speed have lower down.

Okay. Revert back to RWIN at 513920.

I suspect your ISP has not open your line to 30/5 mbps yet. Check with them again.

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:14 am

i run a ftp download test and the test result was 3.5mb/s down~~~~but when i run a speedtest like speedtest.net and speakeasy.net the result was 7000up/3000down~~~

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:31 am

Use these settings with TCP Optimizer:

General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU - 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 256960
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck

Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:01 am

i don't know why~~~i get bad result when i test it in speakeasy and speedtest.net~but when i test it in dslreports the result was 24500/4000

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:06 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:i don't know why~~~i get bad result when i test it in speakeasy and speedtest.net~but when i test it in dslreports the result was 24500/4000

Do tracerts to speakeasy, speedguide and dslreports and compare the ping times. It may be that your signals hit some intermediate routers that are not working properly.

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:32 am

how to do tracert??

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:40 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:how to do tracert??

To do a tracert, click 'Start' and then 'Run'. Type "cmd" into the box and click 'ok'.

A DOS black screen will appear. Type after the C:\>

tracert http://www.speedguide.net

and press enter key

When test is completed, move mouse cusor to the DOS black screen, click right and choose 'select all'.

Move mouse cursor to the Quick Reply box of this forum, click right and 'paste'.

After that do the same for http://www.speakeasy.net and http://www.dslreports.com

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:41 am

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.speedguide.net

Tracing route to speedguide.net [66.230.207.58]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 8 ms 6 ms 10.43.0.1
2 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.221.162]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 64.15.0.10
7 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms g1-1.pr0.nycx.hostway.net [198.32.160.142]
8 40 ms 39 ms 39 ms g9-2.co1.tpax.hostway.net [64.156.25.93]
9 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms speedguide.net [66.230.207.58]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.speakeasy.net

Tracing route to http://www.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.156]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.43.0.1
2 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.221.161]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 7 ms 9 ms 7 ms 64.15.0.17
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms ae-2-52.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.33]
8 77 ms 77 ms 78 ms as-1-0.mp2.Seattle1.Level3.net [209.247.10.133]

9 76 ms 76 ms 77 ms ge-11-1.hsa1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.102]

10 79 ms 77 ms 77 ms unknown.Level3.net [63.211.220.66]
11 78 ms 79 ms 84 ms 152.ge-1-3-0.sr2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.82.54
]
12 78 ms 77 ms 78 ms http://www.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.156]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.dslreports.com

Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 10.43.0.1
2 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.221.162]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 8 ms 6 ms 6 ms 64.15.0.41
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 8 ms 18 ms 6 ms 12.ae0.gbr1.tl9.nac.net [209.123.11.71]
9 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 33.ge-3-0-0.gbr2.nwr.nac.net [209.123.11.7]
10 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
11 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms http://www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]

Trace complete.

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:33 am

phillipxenxciel wrote:C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.speedguide.net

Tracing route to speedguide.net [66.230.207.58]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 8 ms 6 ms 10.43.0.1
2 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.xxx.xxx]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 64.15.0.10
7 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms g1-1.pr0.nycx.hostway.net [198.32.160.142]
8 40 ms 39 ms 39 ms g9-2.co1.tpax.hostway.net [64.156.25.93]
9 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms speedguide.net [66.230.207.58]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.speakeasy.net

Tracing route to http://www.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.156]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.43.0.1
2 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.xxx.xxx]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 7 ms 9 ms 7 ms 64.15.0.17
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms ae-2-52.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.33]
8 77 ms 77 ms 78 ms as-1-0.mp2.Seattle1.Level3.net [209.247.10.133]

9 76 ms 76 ms 77 ms ge-11-1.hsa1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.102]

10 79 ms 77 ms 77 ms unknown.Level3.net [63.211.220.66]
11 78 ms 79 ms 84 ms 152.ge-1-3-0.sr2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.82.54
]
12 78 ms 77 ms 78 ms http://www.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.156]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert http://www.dslreports.com

Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 10.43.0.1
2 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.nyk4ny.cv.net [67.83.xxx.xxx]
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 8 ms 6 ms 6 ms 64.15.0.41
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 8 ms 18 ms 6 ms 12.ae0.gbr1.tl9.nac.net [209.123.11.71]
9 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 33.ge-3-0-0.gbr2.nwr.nac.net [209.123.11.7]
10 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]
11 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms http://www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]

Trace complete.

The reason www dslreports.com gives you such go speed test results is that you are very near to their test server with ping times of only 10ms while http://www.speedguide.net is at halfway distance and http://www.speakeasy.net the furtherest at 78ms.

But these 3 tracerts show your ping times at hop 1 varies from a good 4ms to a bad 8ms. This shows the possible presence of electrical noise affecting your modem. Ensure your modem is located a few feet away from ANY other electrical devices.

When your modem is working perfectly, your 3 ping times at hop 1 will all be 4ms.

phillipxenxciel · Post by **phillipxenxciel** » Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:02 pm

oh~~~~yea~~~i will put the modem to a different place~~~well~~~after all~~i think my speed is fast enought already~~~thanks so much for helping me this few days~~~