Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:35 pm

Here's a Rolling Stone article that gives compelling evidence that it was.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... n_stolen/1

Tons of footnotes for those who would say...."Give me links!".

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:36 pm

2 1/2 years late is kinda late.

Ghosthunter · Post by **Ghosthunter** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:38 pm

LOL...democrats would have won if they had a decent candidate

my guess is they gonna lose in 2008...i am predicting that now..i dont see any good candidates...

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:39 pm

Yep...as soon as Kerry conceded, it was too late.

IF it did happen, it's still a good thing that the public gets to see what was going on, no?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:40 pm

Ghosthunter wrote:LOL...democrats would have won if they had a decent candidate

my guess is they gonna lose in 2008...i am predicting that now..i dont see any good candidates...

Actually the Dems have a lot of good candidates then and now. There just aren't any that YOU like.

Other than that, how did you like that article?

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:40 pm

downhill wrote:Yep...as soon as Kerry conceded, it was too late.

IF it did happen, it's still a good thing that the public gets to see what was going on, no?

No, its better to leave the public in the dark while the people that run the show choose the next canidates and president.

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:42 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:No, its better to leave the public in the dark while the people that run the show choose the next canidates and president.

I don't think that Pressman and General Electric have it in them to pick a good President.

thepieman · Post by **thepieman** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:42 pm

A day late and a dollar short. Where was this sleuth when they needed him.

Pie

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:48 pm

downhill wrote:

I don't think that Pressman and General Electric have it in them to pick a good President.

**** they can pronounce nuclear and spell bougainvillea, I have faith.

cybotron r_9 · Post by **cybotron r_9** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:19 pm

downhill wrote:Here's a Rolling Stone article that gives compelling evidence that it was.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... n_stolen/1

Tons of footnotes for those who would say...."Give me links!".

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/ ... ex_np.html

Ghosthunter · Post by **Ghosthunter** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:21 pm

downhill wrote:Actually the Dems have a lot of good candidates then and now. There just aren't any that YOU like.

Other than that, how did you like that article?

who? only one it seems people are pushing is hillary and you and i know she wont win

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:23 pm

cybotron r_9 wrote:http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/ ... ex_np.html

Yeah I read that the other day. I'll say this much...unlike the Freeper site....at least Salon WILL show another side of the coin.

cybo..that's one man's opinion. Have you looked up the reporters credentials?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:23 pm

Ghosthunter wrote:who? only one it seems people are pushing is hillary and you and i know she wont win

Well you see...you don't like her, either.

Bo Riddick · Post by **Bo Riddick** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:29 pm

Yes, yes we did......

It was a VRWC!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:30 pm

Bo Riddick wrote:Yes, yes we did......

It was a VRWC!

Ah.....the proxy poster is back.

What's up?

Nothing wrong with a VRWC!

That's a ton better than an Ann Coulter who can't seem to figure out what voting precient she's in.

Bo Riddick · Post by **Bo Riddick** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:33 pm

cybotron r_9 wrote:http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/ ... ex_np.html

I looked at the numbers in RFK's data.

He is talking about 350,000 possible "uncounted" votes, out of a 200,000,000 field!

Please! If the election was THAT CLOSE, the minute percentage of the 350,000 would make no difference at all.

Such a small percentage (basically 50/50) would not have altered the electoral results!

The mere fact that the vote was so close, indicates to me, that there was a large majority of the American Population, who supported Bush!.... This says a lot about the outcome!

Bo Riddick · Post by **Bo Riddick** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:34 pm

downhill wrote:Ah.....the proxy poster is back.

What's up?

Nothing wrong with a VRWC!

That's a ton better than an Ann Coulter who can't seem to figure out what voting precient she's in.

You gonna try the "I was drunk, I'm so sorry" routine again?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:34 pm

Bo Riddick wrote:I looked at the numbers in RFK's data.

He is talking about 350,000 possible "uncounted" votes, out of a 200,000,000 field!

Please! If the election was THAT CLOSE, the minute percentage of the 350,000 would make no difference at all.

Such a small percentage (basically 50/50) would not have altered the electoral results!

The mere fact that the vote was so close, indicates to me, that there was a large majority of the American Population, who supported Bush!.... This says a lot about the outcome!

Er...umm......

Didn't you take government in highschool?

It's not the popular vote, it's the electoral vote.

I've not made up my mind on the article but the mentioned transgressions in Ohio would have given Kerry the nod.

It probably would be something not even looked at if there wasn't so much bs going on with Blackwell. No?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:36 pm

Bo Rid dick wrote:You gonna try the "I was drunk, I'm so sorry" routine again?

I'm probably more sober than you are right now.

Oh yeah......I wasn't really ever sorry. It was a ploy to pacify you, Mr. proxy.

Bo Riddick · Post by **Bo Riddick** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:41 pm

downhill wrote:.......Oh yeah......I wasn't really ever sorry. It was a ploy to pacify you, Mr. proxy.

And that is what makes you so sad and shameful as a mod.

Your need fo a childlike retort...

Trully shamefull!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Bo Riddick wrote:And that is what makes you so sad and shameful as a mod.

Your need fo a childlike retort...

Trully shamefull!

A lecture from someone who has to hide behind a proxy?

OK.....I'm shamefull........I feel terrible. Just terrible.

Breaks over...Lets get back to topic.

Bo Riddick · Post by **Bo Riddick** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:18 pm

downhill wrote:A lecture from someone who has to hide behind a proxy?

OK.....I'm shamefull........I feel terrible. Just terrible.

Breaks over...Lets get back to topic.

This is just another example of what makes you such a sad mod. I have never posted from a proxy, to my knowledge. Just because I travel for work and at times post from differing ips means nothing......but again you already know I'm not behind a proxy, that doesn't matter to you. Nor was I last time you plead drunken stupoor after leveling baseless allegagtions against me. the only thing that apperently matters to you is using your positions as mod to throw baseless allegations about...

Shame on you!

Ahren · Post by **Ahren** » Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:44 pm

Bo Riddick wrote:This is just another example of what makes you such a sad mod. I have never posted from a proxy, to my knowledge. Just because I travel for work and at times post from differing ips means nothing......but again you already know I'm not behind a proxy, that doesn't matter to you. Nor was I last time you plead drunken stupoor after leveling baseless allegagtions against me. the only thing that apperently matters to you is using your positions as mod to throw baseless allegations about...

Shame on you!

Troll much, Douchebag?

Oh wait...yes, yes you do.

Carry on.