General discussion related to Cable Modems, DSL, Wireless, Fiber, Mobile Networks, Wireless ISPs, Satellite, or any other type of high-speed Internet connection, general issues and questions here. Review and discuss ISPs as well (AT&T / SBC, BellSouth, Bright House, CableOne, Charter, Comcast, Covad, Cox, Cablevision / Optimum Online, TMobile, Verizon FIOS, Shaw, Telus, Starlink, etc.)
What more can I say? I've had this book since the day my cable was installed!!!
[ 04-12-2001: Message edited by: DaveM ]
RCA Cable Modem 225 - BEFSR41 Linksys router - DLINK USB 2.0 10/100 NIC - Linksys 10/100 16 port and 5 port Switches - Pentium PIV 2.0A CPU with a Thermaltake Volcano 7+ Copper Heatsink/Fan combo - 512 MB PC800 Rambus RAM - Intel D850MV motherboard - 240GB hard drive space, 2ea 40GB and 2ea 80GB as a 160GB ATA 133 Raid drive using a Promise TX2000 PCI Raid Controller, Just bought a Maxtor 160 GB 8mb buffer drive to add for more video editing - Buslink (oem Ricoh MP5125a) RW5125a DVD+RW/+R Burner and TDK 24x10x40x CDRW drives - ATI 64MB DDR All In Wonder Radeon-8500-DV with excellent MPEG2 Capture, TV, and Playback Accelerator Video Card - Sound Blaster Live 5.1 Audio with 4.1 Altec Lansing surround speakers - Enermax EG465P-VE (430 watt) Whisper Quiet Power Supply - Viewsonic VA800 17.4 Inch LCD Display (equivalent in size to a 19 inch Flat Screen CRT display) - Windows XP Pro (registered and activated) - Comcast cable service with 1.8mbit down / 256kbit up.
Well, I'll give you want you want. I think it is unfair! Such a ridiculously low upload cap could be potentially stiffling new ideas, and surely the way people use the connection.
You got a broadband connection because you thought it would be liberating and transform the way you use the internet. I think that upload cap kills that possibility!
it'd be different if EVERY part in the US had the 128kbps upload cap, but truth is not every place does, not every node is capped, that's what makes it unfair
also 128kbps is lame for cable, it's potential is so much greater, that's a real lame cap, in reality it should really be 384kbps that's much more reasonable...
"Would you mind not standing on my chest, my hats on fire." - The Doctor
Agreed.... 384kpbs would be fair, but 128 is such a ridiculously low number it is insane. Don't give me the crap about the node bandwidth either! There is plenty for a higher cap, unless they just do not know how to engineer their network properly.
My provider, OOL, has a 1000kbps cap which I think is very fair. Furthermore, they don't seem to have any problems with their network architecture. Although, they seem to do a very good job of upkeep. @Home could defenately do better for their customers!
but they got fed up with all the complaints about @home and all the problems, so they broke off into their own thing called OOL and are doing MUCH better without @Home
just goes to show ya...
"Would you mind not standing on my chest, my hats on fire." - The Doctor
Nodes dont matter on which cap you get. Its all set in your individual boot record. As a matter of fact, I have 15 people on my node, yes, thats all. All but 5 were capped. The 5 that were uncapped were me and 3 other people.
Im OOL's biggest fan. I cant get it or anything but ill be damned if i dont wish that i could. Im in GA so nj is quite far from me. I even go to the forum at dslr. A man can dream cant he?
Bellsouth: Dsl will be available in your area by x mas! Me: Uh huh
Nodes matter only when they become saturated. Although, there is plenty of downstream bandwidth available. And the limited upstream is plenty if divided right (caps) and they monitor and split as required.
BTW, been searching for a new place. I told the real estate agent, that it had to be in OOL territory. I don't care how many bathrooms, but internet access options (or lack there of) could be a deal breaker!