Kasperysky or Nod32?

General Network security, firewalls, port filtering/forwarding, wireless security, anti-spyware, as well as spam control and privacy discussions.
Post Reply
touser3
Regular Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2000 12:00 am

Kasperysky or Nod32?

Post by touser3 »

Hello everyone, my license for nod32 just ran out and i am in the market for a new A/V program. I have been happy with nod32 for many years but i keep hearing great things about kaspersky. My main concern is i hear that kaspersky is a real pig on system resources/cpu usage? The reason i went to nod32 in the first place was because it was so lightweight and still got the job done. Any opinions are greatly appreciated!
User avatar
chpalmer
Advanced Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 3:52 pm
Location: Kitsap co Wa

Post by chpalmer »

Kaspersky! :thumb:

I have a 1.4 gig AMD machine with 200fsb. I could not see any slowdowns on system performance when I installed.
Never take any crap off an inanimate object!!

Never send email to this address: spam@euclidian.com. This is a spam trap and everyone sending any email to this address will be blacklisted.
touser3
Regular Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2000 12:00 am

Post by touser3 »

Thanks for the reply chpalmer, do you think there is any reason to buy the personal pro version over the personal version considering it costs $30 more?
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

Kaspersky definitely.

:thumb: :2cool:
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

Never used Kaspersky, but would be interested in trying it. :)

I use NOD32 at work. It does what I need it to do, so....
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

touser3 wrote:The reason i went to nod32 in the first place was because it was so lightweight and still got the job done.
Light system hit, and the fact that's it's still held as having the most awards for detection rate from the independent Virus Bulletin, I love it!

Especially the newer 2.12 version, did your subscription last up until recently, which you would have gotten the major update a few weeks ago? This new version is INCREDIBLE!
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Especially the newer 2.12 version, did your subscription last up until recently, which you would have gotten the major update a few weeks ago? This new version is INCREDIBLE!
Ye,

Did you automatically get the new version?
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

CableDude wrote:Ye,

Did you automatically get the new version?
Yeah I piddled around with the beta of it earlier, in the states it was released gradually after the 9th. Your automatic update should have received it...it was the update that prompted for a reboot afterwards.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

Hmmm... not yet. I may have to manually do this on some machines. :mad:

I'll have to check my machine. I know I have yet to be prompted for a restart.
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Touser3....I've read, and heard, about Kapersky being a bit of a hit performance wise on some systems. Would be curious, if you do try switching, run a benchmark or two (like 3Dmark 2003) with NOD32 AMON running, then when you yank NOD32 and install Kapersky, run a 3DMark with it's real time running.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
chpalmer
Advanced Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 3:52 pm
Location: Kitsap co Wa

Post by chpalmer »

Id be curious about the performance hit also, as I ran my last computer till 30% of the programs I tried to run needed a faster processor even to install :p

Also be interested how the newer version of NOD does here earlier post :)
Never take any crap off an inanimate object!!

Never send email to this address: spam@euclidian.com. This is a spam trap and everyone sending any email to this address will be blacklisted.
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

I also didn't receive the update that required a restart.
.
User avatar
goobee
Advanced Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Sunny California

Post by goobee »

I am running Kaspersky Person ver 5. It's been working great for me. Previously, I used Norton 2004 and McAfee 8.0, both of which were resource hogs and noticable slowed my systems down. (we're talking AMD duallie boxes and > 3.0gig Intels)

Sorry I don't have any benches available, the only thing I can tell you is that on medium security setting, it very fast. If you use high, it scans all files including compressed files which takes a bit longer.

I hope this helps.
"Signature?........We don't need no stinkin' Signature!!!"
touser3
Regular Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2000 12:00 am

Post by touser3 »

Thank you everyone for the reply's. i went ahead and bought kaspersky personal pro. Nod32 is great but i've had it for years and figured i would give the competitor a shot. So far it seems to be pretty good, although i dont like how the program seems to be built into several different smaller applications. I will run a benchmark app to see if there is any noticeable performance hit compared to nod32.
User avatar
The_Lurker
Senior Member
Posts: 2862
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 12:00 pm

Post by The_Lurker »

I've been runing Kaspersky for a few years now, since the 3.5 train.

it did get a bad rap for being a performance hog back then, only because it was set out of the box to scan archive(zip,rar,ace ect) files as well as others.(keep in mind it would scan those files anyway when you would attempt to access them.)

ver 5.0 is supposed to be pretty slick.

i'm very happy with ver. 4.5

good choice. :thumb:
Well ROTFL, Skip, it ain't gonna happen; you'd better get back to buying armor upgrades off eBay.
just for the crybabies.....
Bush won, get over it snivelers. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'reilly
Hello canada LOL!
Post Reply