Worlds Fastest Personal Computer
Worlds Fastest Personal Computer
(The Protection of all with the Wadget Eye)
(Never Trust Intel To Do AMD'S Job)
(Never Trust Intel To Do AMD'S Job)
Ya know, that computer kinda sounds sweet
and i'm not a mac person
i wouldn't mind having one to play around with
the dual 2ghz cpu one with a 1Ghz fsb per cpu doesn't sound to bad
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/W ... y=PowerMac
and i'm not a mac person
i wouldn't mind having one to play around with
the dual 2ghz cpu one with a 1Ghz fsb per cpu doesn't sound to bad
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/W ... y=PowerMac
"Would you mind not standing on my chest, my hats on fire." - The Doctor
they compared it to a dell?”World’s fastest” based on SPEC® CPU 2000 benchmark results and leading professional application performance tests against 3 GHz Pentium 4-based Dell Dimension 8300 and 3.06 GHz Dual Xeon-based Dell Precision 650. SPEC® CPU 2000 benchmarks run with GCC 3.3 and independently tested, full report available from Veritest; professional applications tested by Apple, June 2003.
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
I'm out of time, but someone dig up those posts where that so called "independent labs" ran tests that were indeed found to be biased, not utilizing Xeon features, yet utilizing Apple features.
Yeah, fair test....lets try comparing apples to apples next time (excuse the pun).
Reminds me of that test they did back in the early iMac days, where they'd compare their iMac with an ATI Rage Pro Turbo against a Packard Smell with an S-3 Virge 2 meg card...and brag about how fast MacQuake ran .
I'm not kidding you...they actually ran this comparison ad for quite some time.
Yeah, fair test....lets try comparing apples to apples next time (excuse the pun).
Reminds me of that test they did back in the early iMac days, where they'd compare their iMac with an ATI Rage Pro Turbo against a Packard Smell with an S-3 Virge 2 meg card...and brag about how fast MacQuake ran .
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!
Wow...
It's kinda like having a Porsche 911 and living on a island with no roads longer than your driveway. What good is all that power when the system runs slow and most of the apps are outperformed by Wintel versions?
Coming from a Mac background I have to say once I started using a PC, I never went back. My dad still uses Mac's at home to this day, but I built him a modest 1700+ system and he uses it 90% of the time over his beloved G4 now. That Mac is dog-slow on dialup compared to the PC..... makes we wonder....
It's kinda like having a Porsche 911 and living on a island with no roads longer than your driveway. What good is all that power when the system runs slow and most of the apps are outperformed by Wintel versions?
Coming from a Mac background I have to say once I started using a PC, I never went back. My dad still uses Mac's at home to this day, but I built him a modest 1700+ system and he uses it 90% of the time over his beloved G4 now. That Mac is dog-slow on dialup compared to the PC..... makes we wonder....
Intel P4 2.8 800FSB / Asus P4P800SE / Corsair 1024MB PC3200 / Antec Sonata / TruePower 380w
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2
- YARDofSTUF
- Posts: 70006
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: USA
-
deleted_acct
-
Broadsword
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 1:52 pm
Motorola used to make the proccesors for Apple..not sure if they still do!
This is just a personal opinion: i've got nothing against Mac's but i think they r way overrated just like Intel is!
I do admit that there a few things from the Mac that i would like to see on the PC (but that will probably never happen) and visa versa
For graphics and everything i'm sure they r great...but with the PCS now-a-days scaling to 3+ Ghz and still rizing, new technologies being created for PC's (PCI Express, Serial ATA, Hammer {integrated memory controller}, etc.), the new graphichs cards coming out (i heard that ATI 9800 Pro is REALLY sweet), the price vs performance ration and being able to customize a PC from the hardware to the software (atleast u can install indows or linux or both on u're pc) PC are the way to go!
plus i heard that Mac's tend to break down more often than PC's!
...so i've heard...
once again...thats just my opinion!
This is just a personal opinion: i've got nothing against Mac's but i think they r way overrated just like Intel is!
I do admit that there a few things from the Mac that i would like to see on the PC (but that will probably never happen) and visa versa
For graphics and everything i'm sure they r great...but with the PCS now-a-days scaling to 3+ Ghz and still rizing, new technologies being created for PC's (PCI Express, Serial ATA, Hammer {integrated memory controller}, etc.), the new graphichs cards coming out (i heard that ATI 9800 Pro is REALLY sweet), the price vs performance ration and being able to customize a PC from the hardware to the software (atleast u can install indows or linux or both on u're pc) PC are the way to go!
plus i heard that Mac's tend to break down more often than PC's!
...so i've heard...
once again...thats just my opinion!
-
nepenthe
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 12:00 pm
- Location: between pain, bliss and the Garden State
I wonder how it would compare to a dual Xeon 3.06?
I want to learn more and more to see as beautiful what is necessary in things; then I shall be one of those who make things beautiful. Amor fati: let that be my love henceforth! I do not want to wage war against what is ugly. I do not want to accuse; I do not even want to accuse those who accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all in all and on the whole: some day I wish to be only a Yes-sayer.