athlon rambus
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:37 pm
hey does athlon have amobo taht supports rambus?
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://speedguide.net/forums/
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
your're a jerk
he should be happy thats all he got, he has insulted many peeps, be in respect for the board lets just ignore him and not post more attacks, flamage or falsities incase luckers, or readers get confused, i think its best.Originally posted by PING
I am on HnH's side.. he asked a serious question and got flak...
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
i'm sorry, i only instult back for being insulted first. in the very beginning i only wanted help for my upgrade, which i did and am very thankful, but some of you (i think it was terrance) start flaming on my that athlon was better. well i agree now! you don't need to start cussing and everything. i never cussed at you first, you started it terrance. i just asked a newbie question, WELL SORRY, isn't this the place to be answers? i even apologized but you didn't accept it. HAHA, it's like you don't accept your own appology cause you started it and i'm giving the apology. this stinks
Strike one.Terrancelam wrote:
Whatever, welcome to SG.
Strike Two.HelloNhalleluja wrote:
whatever
"..If your not a part of the solution, then you are a part of the pollution."
oh gosh!
The bottom line:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
(from Toms Hardware) (whats wrong with him?)
(i don't like him either) (but his benchmarks are accurate so face the facts jack!)
Bottom Line
This time I presented you four different benchmarks and in three of them Pentium 4 came out victorious. Basing a whole article on those four benchmarks would automatically have to lead to a favorable review of Pentium 4.
This is not my only Pentium 4 article however and those are not the only benchmarks we ran. Therefore the outcome still remains the same. Pentium 4 has got clear flaws, but it's not a piece of crap either. It performs well in 3D-games, it is able to do very fast video-encoding and it seems to give you some kind of edge using the Internet, boosting Intel's amusing 'NetBurst'-hype.
Pentium 4 is still much more expensive than AMD's Athlon, it only runs with the expensive RDRAM-memory and it requires a new kind of power supply and case, thus blowing up system costs even more. In office applications and several other areas Athlon is able to beat Pentium 4 and that at significantly lower costs. Then there is the issue that by this time next year a new model will replace the current Pentium 4, introducing a different socket (Socket478), which destroys a reasonable upgrade path.
There is enough that speaks against Pentium 4 for people who are reasonable. Once again I have to express my feel about Pentium 4 as some kind of life-style symbol rather than a must-have. However, AMD has started to run into trouble as well. While I am being bold enough supplying you with benchmark data of Athlon 1200/133 on an AMD760-platform, you are utterly unable to get your hands on one. It is currently unknown how long it will take until AMD760 motherboards will become available and the alternative ALi Magik1 platforms have so far shown significant lower performance than AMD760.
If you have dedicated areas in which you want your computer to perform particularly well, if those areas should be 3D gaming, video encoding or other bandwidth intensive software and if you should not shy away from high system costs and the missing upgrade path, you should indeed consider Pentium 4. However, if you want a balanced system with excellent performance at a good price I heavily suggest Athlon, even though you might have to wait until the high-end AMD760/DDR platforms will become available.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That you are an uninformed buyer who should go Dell? COME ON! EVEN Tom admits it!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pentium 4 is still much more expensive than AMD's Athlon, it only runs with the expensive RDRAM-memory and it requires a new kind of power supply and case, thus blowing up system costs even more. In office applications and several other areas Athlon is able to beat Pentium 4 and that at significantly lower costs. Then there is the issue that by this time next year a new model will replace the current Pentium 4, introducing a different socket (Socket478), which destroys a reasonable upgrade path.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not only that, writes in his supposed P4 positive review:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you should not shy away from high system costs and the missing upgrade path,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well geez, I wonder what the smart thing would be to do, buy a box that cost an enomous heap of money and has no possible future? or get a cost effiecent box that not only competes with this expensive box in benchmarks, but will save me much money. Gee, I wonder. Look, HnH, you obviously have no clue as to what you are talking about, so I'll be even more blunt, GO CUT AND PASTE SOMETHING THAT SEEMS THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTELLIGENT AND THEN POST IT.
God you contradict yourself so much with posting that darn gosh not intelligent article from "Tom's Hardware", it's not even funny anymore. I don't care how new, irgnorant or annoying you are, go learn something.
Strike 3HelloNhalleluja wrote:
your a frickin idiot, the pentium 4 is a really good processor and it can beat the athlon any day, just because your so proud of athlon doesn't mean you gotta try to screw all the people who like pentium 4. I didn't invite you to start trash talking here. All i was doing was trying to compare the p4 and athlon and add a poll, you don't have to start being so arrogant. dude just go away...your not the admin or someone special or your better than others, go to mentalhealth.org or something, just go away... i'm no super geek like you, i'm just trying to upgrade my little pc here!
Strike 4.HnH Wrote
why can't anyone prove athlon is better?
HnH says to Everyone
ok sorry, i'm no super geek freak like you...in real life i can picture you, hairy, thick glasses, red eyes, a loser, no life
hahahahahahahahahaa so 1,2,3: TAKE that, SHUTUP, and SHOVE it up your candy ass you GAY-ASS-*****SUCKING-CHESTHAIRLICKING-BUTTHUMPING-*****FU**KING-JERKASS-FCUKER! case closed
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
ok i admit i have been a bad newb for the last few days. i dun want my posts in the future to be talked about it, can we call a truce? i'm sorrrrrrrry. k? i've also decided about amd athlon, i've just read in a 'zine that it was more powerful that a p4. can we be friends again? hey....can we please forget about the last few posts? start over?
I"M SORRY!
Some guy....thanksOriginally posted by terrancelam
You started this and insulted alot of people. They gave you an opening for an apology, you refused it. Then you insulted me and macho. Go find out your own information and get help for other people. And for your information, YOU are the jerk.
Originally posted by PING
I am on HnH's side.. he asked a serious question and got flak...
yeah what did you help me? i think you made a little mess. your forgiven by me at least. but this is wrong. i'm not the bad guy hereOriginally posted by terrancelam
Maybe he shouldn't have gone off mouthing to all the people who were willing to help him at first.
tried, i can't close the whole thread down, only adminOriginally posted by m4a2t0t
u can do it urself in edit i think