Page 1 of 1

athlon rambus

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:37 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
hey does athlon have amobo taht supports rambus?

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:42 pm
by brembo
Haha....good luck gettin an answer.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:47 pm
by FunK
Yeah ASUS makes the "GAFL" series Motherboards. They support RAMBUS with the new "GFY" architechture.

You may find some information on them if you do a search for "GFY" on Yahoo (have to search for webpage matches). It's the first link (I think).

:)

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:54 pm
by Damnit
Good one FunK!!!!!!

RLMAO :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

He should be able to find it if he follows the direction closely...


"GFY"

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:57 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
your fooling no one, u guys suck

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 10:57 pm
by FunK
(To Damnit)
Busy night eh man?

Get on ICQ when ya get home.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 11:01 pm
by Gaming-Module
The VIA KT830A supports Athlon Palomino and RDRAM.

But only RDRAM in 256 meg sticks, of course.

But you have to order the memory, then the mobo a week after the RAM arrives.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2001 11:24 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Yes!

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 12:27 am
by terrancelam
There is such a thing! Go call Dell for it! And while your at it, for extra value performance, why don't you order a Geforce2mx 400 with 128 of ddr or sd-ram?

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 7:45 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
your're a jerk

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 8:04 pm
by m4a2t0t
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
your're a jerk

emm..NO..your the one starting trouble

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 8:09 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
by asking about athlon ram suppport, uh no

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 10:33 pm
by terrancelam
You started this and insulted alot of people. They gave you an opening for an apology, you refused it. Then you insulted me and macho. Go find out your own information and get help for other people. And for your information, YOU are the jerk.

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 10:47 pm
by Gaming-Module
Is HnH still posting?

I have his arse on ignore.

lol

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 11:00 pm
by Joe
I am on HnH's side.. he asked a serious question and got flak...

Well you know what?

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 11:13 pm
by terrancelam
Maybe he shouldn't have gone off mouthing to all the people who were willing to help him at first.

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 11:49 pm
by YARDofSTUF
Originally posted by PING
I am on HnH's side.. he asked a serious question and got flak...
he should be happy thats all he got, he has insulted many peeps, be in respect for the board lets just ignore him and not post more attacks, flamage or falsities incase luckers, or readers get confused, i think its best.

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2001 11:56 pm
by HelloNhalleluja
i'm sorry, i only instult back for being insulted first. in the very beginning i only wanted help for my upgrade, which i did and am very thankful, but some of you (i think it was terrance :) ) start flaming on my that athlon was better. well i agree now! you don't need to start cussing and everything. i never cussed at you first, you started it terrance. i just asked a newbie question, WELL SORRY, isn't this the place to be answers? i even apologized but you didn't accept it. HAHA, it's like you don't accept your own appology cause you started it and i'm giving the apology. this stinks

Oh really now.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 12:23 am
by terrancelam
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
i'm sorry, i only instult back for being insulted first. in the very beginning i only wanted help for my upgrade, which i did and am very thankful, but some of you (i think it was terrance :) ) start flaming on my that athlon was better. well i agree now! you don't need to start cussing and everything. i never cussed at you first, you started it terrance. i just asked a newbie question, WELL SORRY, isn't this the place to be answers? i even apologized but you didn't accept it. HAHA, it's like you don't accept your own appology cause you started it and i'm giving the apology. this stinks
Terrancelam wrote:
Whatever, welcome to SG.
Strike one.
HelloNhalleluja wrote:

whatever

"..If your not a part of the solution, then you are a part of the pollution."
oh gosh!
Strike Two.
The bottom line:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
(from Toms Hardware) (whats wrong with him?)
(i don't like him either) (but his benchmarks are accurate so face the facts jack!)

Bottom Line

This time I presented you four different benchmarks and in three of them Pentium 4 came out victorious. Basing a whole article on those four benchmarks would automatically have to lead to a favorable review of Pentium 4.

This is not my only Pentium 4 article however and those are not the only benchmarks we ran. Therefore the outcome still remains the same. Pentium 4 has got clear flaws, but it's not a piece of crap either. It performs well in 3D-games, it is able to do very fast video-encoding and it seems to give you some kind of edge using the Internet, boosting Intel's amusing 'NetBurst'-hype.

Pentium 4 is still much more expensive than AMD's Athlon, it only runs with the expensive RDRAM-memory and it requires a new kind of power supply and case, thus blowing up system costs even more. In office applications and several other areas Athlon is able to beat Pentium 4 and that at significantly lower costs. Then there is the issue that by this time next year a new model will replace the current Pentium 4, introducing a different socket (Socket478), which destroys a reasonable upgrade path.

There is enough that speaks against Pentium 4 for people who are reasonable. Once again I have to express my feel about Pentium 4 as some kind of life-style symbol rather than a must-have. However, AMD has started to run into trouble as well. While I am being bold enough supplying you with benchmark data of Athlon 1200/133 on an AMD760-platform, you are utterly unable to get your hands on one. It is currently unknown how long it will take until AMD760 motherboards will become available and the alternative ALi Magik1 platforms have so far shown significant lower performance than AMD760.

If you have dedicated areas in which you want your computer to perform particularly well, if those areas should be 3D gaming, video encoding or other bandwidth intensive software and if you should not shy away from high system costs and the missing upgrade path, you should indeed consider Pentium 4. However, if you want a balanced system with excellent performance at a good price I heavily suggest Athlon, even though you might have to wait until the high-end AMD760/DDR platforms will become available.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



That you are an uninformed buyer who should go Dell? COME ON! EVEN Tom admits it!

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pentium 4 is still much more expensive than AMD's Athlon, it only runs with the expensive RDRAM-memory and it requires a new kind of power supply and case, thus blowing up system costs even more. In office applications and several other areas Athlon is able to beat Pentium 4 and that at significantly lower costs. Then there is the issue that by this time next year a new model will replace the current Pentium 4, introducing a different socket (Socket478), which destroys a reasonable upgrade path.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Not only that, writes in his supposed P4 positive review:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you should not shy away from high system costs and the missing upgrade path,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Well geez, I wonder what the smart thing would be to do, buy a box that cost an enomous heap of money and has no possible future? or get a cost effiecent box that not only competes with this expensive box in benchmarks, but will save me much money. Gee, I wonder. Look, HnH, you obviously have no clue as to what you are talking about, so I'll be even more blunt, GO CUT AND PASTE SOMETHING THAT SEEMS THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTELLIGENT AND THEN POST IT.

God you contradict yourself so much with posting that darn gosh not intelligent article from "Tom's Hardware", it's not even funny anymore. I don't care how new, irgnorant or annoying you are, go learn something.
HelloNhalleluja wrote:

your a frickin idiot, the pentium 4 is a really good processor and it can beat the athlon any day, just because your so proud of athlon doesn't mean you gotta try to screw all the people who like pentium 4. I didn't invite you to start trash talking here. All i was doing was trying to compare the p4 and athlon and add a poll, you don't have to start being so arrogant. dude just go away...your not the admin or someone special or your better than others, go to mentalhealth.org or something, just go away... i'm no super geek like you, i'm just trying to upgrade my little pc here!
Strike 3
I gave you the reason why the Athlon T-bird was better and even Funk was willing to show you. but you posted this.
HnH Wrote
why can't anyone prove athlon is better?
Strike 4.
You just insulted TiggerUpperCut here.
HnH says to Everyone
ok sorry, i'm no super geek freak like you...in real life i can picture you, hairy, thick glasses, red eyes, a loser, no life
hahahahahahahahahaa so 1,2,3: TAKE that, SHUTUP, and SHOVE it up your candy ass you GAY-ASS-*****SUCKING-CHESTHAIRLICKING-BUTTHUMPING-*****FU**KING-JERKASS-FCUKER! case closed

Me and macho even bothered at one point to give you advice and help you with the purchase of upgrading you current computer you very rude and ignorant person!

http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread ... adid=41786
http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread ... adid=41646
http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread ... adid=41837

There are a few more that I haven't posted where people generously tried to help this person.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 12:33 am
by HelloNhalleluja
uh escuse me, where are your posts? lemme quote them...all of thses posts are responses to you yelling at me!!!!...brb, i'm posting...

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 12:58 am
by m4a2t0t

THIS IS FOR TERRANCE

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:52 am
by HelloNhalleluja
THIS IS HOW IT STARTED: THIS IS THE FIRST THREAD...

terrancelam
Senior Member

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 727
HnH Enough.
As a fan of both companies, I offically declare you a newbie who should learn his place. Don't go shooting off your mouth about which company is better, bigger and has a faster CPU. If you knew JACK about the computer industry or the hardware, you'd shut your mouth and think before you speak. Yes the P4 does have a higher memory bandwidth and it may be better for server/workstation applications. BUT in the gaming world, AMD had proven itself to hold it's own with their technology. A 1.4ghz "Thunderbird" can and will hold and beat a P4 1.7 in some aspects. It's plain and simple, more mhz doesn't mean better performance. And for your information, yes AMD cpus do run hotter, but they clearly outperform the Intel's when it comes down to clock for clock. Both have their pros and cons, so it's the user that has to decide what they want and what suits their needs most. And it's not just a few dollars difference between the two companies; right now here in Toronto, the cost of a PIII 866EB cost $202CAD retail, while the AMD T-bird 1.2ghz(266fsb) cost $202 retail. That's a 334mhz difference for the same fricken price. Even when clock for clock (I can't find a T-bird 800, so I'll just use a 900.) a T-bird 900mhz only cost $130 retail, that's a $72 dollar difference, which could buy you a better HS/F solution to cool your cpu.

Go and learn some more before you go on the hardware board posting such flithy newbie garbage.


__________________
Abit VA6 (Slot 1 with a slot 1 to 370 converter on it)
CeleronII 700@1100mhz (Godbless Aplha Heatsinks!! Alhpa PAL6035 with Ys-tech fan)
ATI Radeon 64mb DDR With ViVo@ 191.25mhz clock.(5.5ns Ram)
256mb pc133 (Micron) & 64mbpc 133 (Micron), ((320mb total))
20 gig Maxtor/7200RPM
Win 98se

"..If your not a part of the solution, then you are a part of the pollution." (why does he say that)

Last edited by terrancelam on 08-07-2001 at 02:33 PM


TigerUpperCut
Senior Member

Registered: Jul 1999
Location: I...... AM.......... CANADIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 793
Who the FUK cares about this fuking ignorant newbie. We all know that the P4 sux, but it looks good because of Heavily SSE2 optimized benchmarks. Read about it here: http://www.hardocp.com/reviews/cpus/intel/p417/

The T-bird kills the P4 in all the benchmarks that aren't P4 optimized.

Let the fukin newbie buy his P4, then we all get to laugh at his stupid ass when we spend half the $ he did on a Palomino that is 2x faster.


I SAY SORRY

Originally posted by HelloNhalleluja
ok i admit i have been a bad newb for the last few days. i dun want my posts in the future to be talked about it, can we call a truce? i'm sorrrrrrrry. k? i've also decided about amd athlon, i've just read in a 'zine that it was more powerful that a p4. can we be friends again? hey.... :( can we please forget about the last few posts? start over? :cry: I"M SORRY!

THIS IS WHAT I GET
Originally posted by terrancelam
You started this and insulted alot of people. They gave you an opening for an apology, you refused it. Then you insulted me and macho. Go find out your own information and get help for other people. And for your information, YOU are the jerk.
Some guy....thanks
Originally posted by PING
I am on HnH's side.. he asked a serious question and got flak...

i don't ever like to start arguments, unfortunately i did because i was the first one that supported p4 so much

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:55 am
by HelloNhalleluja
Moderator: please close this thread...thanks

Re: Well you know what?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:56 am
by HelloNhalleluja
Originally posted by terrancelam
Maybe he shouldn't have gone off mouthing to all the people who were willing to help him at first.
yeah what did you help me? i think you made a little mess. your forgiven by me at least. but this is wrong. i'm not the bad guy here

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 1:57 am
by m4a2t0t
u can do it urself in edit i think

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2001 2:24 am
by HelloNhalleluja
Originally posted by m4a2t0t
u can do it urself in edit i think
tried, i can't close the whole thread down, only admin
aren't you going to flame me like you did in the last few posts? :confused: :confused: :confused: