The truth is coming out
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:38 pm
Four more years?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg-e71ID ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg-e71ID ... r_embedded
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://speedguide.net/forums/
downhill wrote:Humm... to think ANY sitting President would have just allowed this is absurd. To also think for one minute that the Whitehouse would have any reason to lie about it is even dumber..
What's really galling about the whole thing is that it was extreme right REPUBLICANS with a mind thought like.... screw it.. we aren't going to fund ANYTHING because we're CHEAP, GREEDY and too self involved to worry about the security of anyone living abroad and especially US embassy's.
How come some of you are unwilling to admit that funding for them was cut by a republican (tea bagger mentality) led congress? Same on you!!
Oh lookie.. a FOX link to be exact. Go figure.. lol The story was politicized for a reason.. To help Romney.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Don't want to tax millionaires at the same tax rate you pay? Fine ! Expect more of this since there isn't any money for this service or much of anything else like education, roads, upgrades to powergrids, monitoring the drug companies to help make sure your drugs are safe, the food industry and especially meat and poultry. Sure lets move this country forward all the way to around 1906.
Within 15 years of this mind set and actually going though with it, we'll be back to either super expensive toll roads everywhere as we hand them all out to big business who'll "take" care of us or we can all drive on dirt roads.. without gravel.
The idea that corporations will always do the right thing or go bust... (Ayn Rand) is plan silly. They'll ALWAYS go for a bigger share before they consider anything else.
Oh and hi there.
Roody wrote:First and foremost I just want to say it's great to see you back here downhill.Oh and I agree with your assessment.
downhill wrote:Humm... to think ANY sitting President would have just allowed this is absurd. To also think for one minute that the Whitehouse would have any reason to lie about it is even dumber..
What's really galling about the whole thing is that it was extreme right REPUBLICANS with a mind thought like.... screw it.. we aren't going to fund ANYTHING because we're CHEAP, GREEDY and too self involved to worry about the security of anyone living abroad and especially US embassy's.
How come some of you are unwilling to admit that funding for them was cut by a republican (tea bagger mentality) led congress? Same on you!!
Oh lookie.. a FOX link to be exact. Go figure.. lol The story was politicized for a reason.. To help Romney.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Don't want to tax millionaires at the same tax rate you pay? Fine ! Expect more of this since there isn't any money for this service or much of anything else like education, roads, upgrades to powergrids, monitoring the drug companies to help make sure your drugs are safe, the food industry and especially meat and poultry. Sure lets move this country forward all the way to around 1906.
Within 15 years of this mind set and actually going though with it, we'll be back to either super expensive toll roads everywhere as we hand them all out to big business who'll "take" care of us or we can all drive on dirt roads.. without gravel.
The idea that corporations will always do the right thing or go bust... (Ayn Rand) is plan silly. They'll ALWAYS go for a bigger share before they consider anything else.
Oh and hi there.
There is far too much proof that this is exactly what happened. It will come out. Just not before elections. Not that elections mean a damn thing, but it does keep people stupid and believing that they actually have a say in things.downhill wrote:Humm... to think ANY sitting President would have just allowed this is absurd. To also think for one minute that the Whitehouse would have any reason to lie about it is even dumber..
blebs wrote:There is far too much proof that this is exactly what happened. It will come out. Just not before elections. Not that elections mean a damn thing, but it does keep people stupid and believing that they actually have a say in things.
Oh yeah, Presidents are not elected. They are selected as RaisinCain said.
Why do I get this feeling that Downhills account has been hacked?
If it's really you, yes, it is nice to see you. The DH I've talked to used to be extreme anti liberal and the comments made here are exactly opposite of that.downhill wrote:Blebs why would you think that? I've always argued against what I think are silly political posts.
For the record. this wasn't an embassy. We don't have them in Benghazi. Tripoli yes. As to the far too much truth that this is exacty what happened isn't even close to the truth. If it was, it would have been all over the news. How come it's just Faux News making all the allegations?
Meantime I would suggest you read some real reports. The CIA has released a timeline of events. Now that's weeks later sure but how long did it take to find out what happened and what was and wasn't done on 9-11? In an effort to get news, sometimes people get things wrong. Big deal.. it'll all come out in the wash.
Should that compound have had more protection? I would say yes of course. Were YOU willing to pay for it cuz I"m betting your congresspeeps voted to cut funding for security overseas.
Second question. Exactly what would be the reason for the Whitehouse to lie about it? Do you honestly think the President has to make decisions on EVERY single thing an ambassador might need or ask for?
Once again this is simply grandstanding to help Romney win the election.
Would you say on the grand scale of things that this was even close to the bombing in Oklahoma City or even 9-11?
We came together as citizens of the United States after both happened. Why not now? Ask yourself that then get back to watching Faux News.
Nice to see you too!
America wins when the people wake up from the brainwashing and admit that the political system is broken. ** FROM THE WORLD SOCIALIST WEB SITE: " Neither candidate will tell the American people the truth: the next administration, whether headed by a Democrat or a Republican, will launch attacks on the living standards, social benefits and democratic rights of the American people on a scale never before seen. This will be combined with stepped-up military aggression overseas, from the Middle East to the Pacific. Whether Obama or Romney is inaugurated next January 20 will affect only the details of this political prospectus, not its broad outlines. Both candidates, the parties they head, represent and defend the interests of the American financial elite, the most reactionary and rapacious social force on the planet." ** BOTTOMLINE: The Federal government represents the interests of the financial elite - not the unwashed masses who stand in line to give up their vote for one of the selected political puppets.