SG Broadband Community

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:42 pm**

An amazing photo.....

*click here*

This thread is about the pic and not the inauguration.

See if you can find the seams.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:49 pm**

Shouldn't this be posted in the digital media forum?

Very cool shot, you can see almost every individual face.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:59 pm**

whoopee do

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:06 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:whoopee do

Aren't you missing a Rush show or something?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:10 pm**

Humboldt wrote:I agree, very cool.

Aren't you missing a Rush show or something?

i did not even click on a link...i am just curious shouldnt this go into digital media forum?

or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:15 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:i did not even click on a link...i am just curious shouldnt this go into digital media forum?

or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

Isn't there a tree outside for you to piss on instead of this thread?

If you followed the link before opening your mouth you'd see that, just as stated in dhd's post, it has nothing to do with the president and everything to do with the picture.

Once again, you're missing the big picture

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:16 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote: or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

That is an amazing pic.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:53 pm**

Cool link DH.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:21 pm**

Saw this a few days ago both on CNN and genmay. If you dig deep enough in the photo, there are some very interesting things to find. Such as an old style large format camera (the kind with the bellows on the front), and various celebrity sightings, as well as snipers on top of the Smithsonian tower...

Hell, I think Jack Bauer may even be in there some where...

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:24 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:i did not even click on a link...i am just curious shouldnt this go into digital media forum?

or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

Troll much?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:29 pm**

Old style camera:

Denzel Washington & Sean Combs:

Spotters on the Smithsonian tower:

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:30 pm**

Oh boy, here we go again.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:34 pm**

downhill wrote:Troll much?

Hmmm, interesting how you call him a troll.

Answer this. How many threads have you moved?
I'll go ahead and answer it for you. More than you can probably count.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:36 pm**

JC wrote:Hmmm, interesting how you call him a troll.

Answer this. How many threads have you moved?
I'll go ahead and answer it for you. More than you can probably count.

John, he was trolling. The thread is about how the pic was made, not about the president.

Just because dhd called it out, doesn't make him wrong.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:40 pm**

Debbie wrote: The thread is about how the pic was made, not about the president.

Exactly, and thus it should be in the digital media forum. Not the general forum.

There are 2 sets of standards. One for the members and one for DH

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:42 pm**

JC wrote:Exactly, and thus it should be in the digital media forum. Not the general forum.

There are 2 sets of standards. One for the members and one for DH

You need to lighten up

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:46 pm**

Looks like Obi-wan was in attendance:

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:52 pm**

Debbie wrote:You need to lighten up

Why, it's the truth.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:54 pm**

JC wrote:Why, it's the truth.

You need to get off the merry-go-round and let it go already. This is getting really old.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:58 pm**

JC wrote:Hmmm, interesting how you call him a troll.

IMO he's not calling him a troll for suggesting the thread is in the wrong forum.

I agree (although I've got mixed feelings about the digital forum's existence) and actually posted that sentiment first.

He's calling him a troll for thread crapping, pure and simple. The thread has nothing to do with the inauguration, not does the link, short of it being the image subject.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:59 pm**

Indy wrote:Looks like Obi-wan was in attendance:

Good call

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:12 pm**

Newt Gingrich made an appearance...

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:18 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:i did not even click on a link...i am just curious shouldnt this go into digital media forum?

or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

Had you just stated your opinion about it should go to the dig media forum, that would have been sufficient...

Instead you twisted it up....

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:21 pm**

Thanks for posting DH.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:26 pm**

Good grief. Moved....lol

Some people I guess.

Nice catches, Indy!!

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:28 pm**

"2 Stagehands walk into a bar... The second one has gaffer tape."

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:36 pm**

JC wrote:Hmmm, interesting how you call him a troll.

Hmmmm, interesting how you troll on in here too, oh wait I don't mean interesting, I mean predictable.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:46 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:i did not even click on a link...i am just curious shouldnt this go into digital media forum?

or because it about obama his savior it goes here?

Why are you not also in Mountianman 's thread telling him it should be in the hardware forums ?

And what is with the snide remark? Couldn't you have just said something to the effect of, "Downhill I feel this should be posted in the Digital Media forums, not the General Discussions."

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:56 pm**

JC wrote:Exactly, and thus it should be in the digital media forum. Not the general forum.

There are 2 sets of standards. One for the members and one for DH

that was my point exactly...because he loves obama he gets to post it in the general forum..but i see he moved it finally

i see things dont change around here like usual...he takes after his savior

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:00 pm**

Humm.... That wasn't your point at all.

.I rest my case. My initial post was correct.

In fact I stated at the beginning that this about the pic. It was you and JC who turned it into something else. I suspect you both had help but hey.....

Have a good day.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:05 pm**

then why post it in general forum and not post it in the digital media forum to begin with?

your telling me you had no idea you had one? the moderator of speedguide?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:07 pm**

It's been moved. Why are you still trolling?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:07 pm**

Dan Quayle:

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:03 pm**

Here is what we know. GH is the same ole person as always who would have had no problem with DH's link if it had been a Republican. JC looks for everyway possible to criticize DH and found yet another loophole to do it. Seriously JC your Anti-DH obsession is becoming creepy.

Now back to the subject at hand. It's an interesting link and site no matter which person it is targeting.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:18 pm**

Roody wrote:Here is what we know. GH is the same ole person as always who would have had no problem with DH's link if it had been a Republican. JC looks for everyway possible to criticize DH and found yet another loophole to do it. Seriously JC your Anti-DH obsession is becoming creepy.

Now back to the subject at hand. It's an interesting link and site no matter which person it is targeting.

That is exactly how I saw it too.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:23 pm**

Roody wrote:Here is what we know. GH is the same ole person as always who would have had no problem with DH's link if it had been a Republican. JC looks for everyway possible to criticize DH and found yet another loophole to do it. Seriously JC your Anti-DH obsession is becoming creepy.

Now back to the subject at hand. It's an interesting link and site no matter which person it is targeting.

LOL someone not posting in the proper forum is now a "loophole"
*noted* ass hole.

Anti- DH obsession

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:25 pm**

JC wrote:LOL someone not posting in the proper forum is now a "loophole"
*noted* ass hole.
Anti- DH obsession

Are you really calling me an ass hole? I'm in a pretty good mood right now, but that can change if you want to keep that up. One thing I simply do NOT tolerate is people swearing at me. You care to tCare to take that back or do we have ourselves an issue here?

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:29 pm**

Roody wrote:Here is what we know. GH is the same ole person as always who would have had no problem with DH's link if it had been a Republican. JC looks for everyway possible to criticize DH and found yet another loophole to do it. Seriously JC your Anti-DH obsession is becoming creepy.

Now back to the subject at hand. It's an interesting link and site no matter which person it is targeting.

oh right roody is a moderator now..oh i am so scared...shaking in my boots

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:31 pm**

Ghosthunter wrote:oh right roody is a moderator now..oh i am so scared...shaking in my boots

GH there is one way I look at your opinion. I read it and then assume the correct response is the opposite of what you think. Every once in awhile you can surprise me. Right now not so much though.

Posted: **Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:38 pm**

Roody wrote:GH there is one way I look at your opinion. I read it and then assume the correct response is the opposite of what you think. Every once in awhile you can surprise me. Right now not so much though.

like i said not much has changed here...same old with new mods who are just liberal though and usual favoritism

SG Broadband Community

How I Made a 1,474-Megapixel Photo During President ObamaÂ’s Inaugural Address

How I Made a 1,474-Megapixel Photo During President Obama’s Inaugural Address