I am leaning toward Hillary for President
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 3:02 pm
hrm
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://speedguide.net/forums/
Pants suit maybe.Sava700 wrote:come up with this while wearing womens clothing did we?
Because George Bush hates black people.Roody wrote:Any specific reason?
I don't want Obama to be president, I think he speaks a lot of hot air but has no substance, and a term with Hillary will be like a term with Bill, and I didn't think he was that bad, plus I think we need a change, time for a democrat to be president (i think its good to go back and forth to bring in new perspectives), plus I like her stances on issues more than Obamas.Roody wrote:Any specific reason?
That's enough Kanye.Izzo wrote:Because George Bush hates black people.
Can you give us examples of this "hot-air" you speak of? And how are we changing if another Clinton gets into office?Brent wrote:I don't want Obama to be president, I think he speaks a lot of hot air but has no substance, and a term with Hillary will be like a term with Bill, and I didn't think he was that bad, plus I think we need a change, time for a democrat to be president (i think its good to go back and forth to bring in new perspectives), plus I like her stances on issues more than Obamas.
I'd hate to see her naked.YARDofSTUF wrote:Pants suit maybe.
Brent wrote:Pretty much everything he says
Hah! You wouldn't pass on an opportunity to see Oprah Winfrey naked for an hour.MadDoctor wrote:I'd hate to see her naked.![]()
Fair enough. Personally I think the country will get a better option then President Bush regardless of who is elected, but Obama is my own personal preference.Brent wrote:I don't want Obama to be president, I think he speaks a lot of hot air but has no substance, and a term with Hillary will be like a term with Bill, and I didn't think he was that bad, plus I think we need a change, time for a democrat to be president (i think its good to go back and forth to bring in new perspectives), plus I like her stances on issues more than Obamas.
What on earth made you think of that? It will take weeks of water-boarding to get that out of my skull.YeOldeStonecat wrote:Hah! You wouldn't pass on an opportunity to see Oprah Winfrey naked for an hour.
He's telling people what they want to hear? Yet its McCain and Hillary who wanted the gas tax dropped, and Obama that said we have to take the blame for some of it and drive less?Brent wrote:Pretty much everything he says, he is just speaking to speak, telling the people what they want to hear, folding and giving in to popular thought instead of standing on his own, there is no substance to him, just my opinion.
Brent wrote:I don't want Obama to be president, I think he speaks a lot of hot air but has no substance, and a term with Hillary will be like a term with Bill, and I didn't think he was that bad, plus I think we need a change, time for a democrat to be president (i think its good to go back and forth to bring in new perspectives), plus I like her stances on issues more than Obamas.
*fixed*MadDoctor wrote:What on earth made you think of that? It will take weeks of water-drip torture from the sweat dripping off of her Michelin man human accordian belly folds to get that out of my skull.
Originally Posted by MadDoctor
What on earth made you think of that? It will take weeks of water-drip torture from the sweat dripping off of her Michelin man human accordian belly folds to get that out of my skull.
YeOldeStonecat wrote:*fixed*![]()
JAFO wrote:![]()
it would take weeks because you wont give in... we know you like the fluffy foldsMadDoctor wrote:What on earth made you think of that? It will take weeks of water-boarding to get that out of my skull.
![]()
Sava700 wrote:come up with this while wearing womens clothing did we?
it's how he rollsShagster wrote:You went from conservative christian to a gay socialist just like that?
Then you made the right choice, cuz she's the underbitch against Obama and would be against McCain.Brent wrote:i'm going for the underdog
I think McCain would be the underdog against either of them. Simply put alot of people want a change and the Republicans are going to be hurt by that. In particular in Congress where the Dems will likely roll to big wins in both branches.JBrazen wrote:Then you made the right choice, cuz she's the underbitch against Obama and would be against McCain.
Kinda hard to do something when you don't have the numbers to actually do something. Just being in the majority doesn't mean you can do much. You have to have the numbers to avoid filibusters. Dems don't have that.Brent wrote:Dems in congress haven't done squat so far, but maybe with a Dem prez.....
Hillary beats Obama, which won't happen, you can be sure that people will come out in droves to make sure that she doesn't take office. I know plenty of Democrats that can't stand her guts and would rather vote McCain than for that She Devil. She has this air about her that people just don't like, nevermind that she's one shady ass bitch.Roody wrote:I think McCain would be the underdog against either of them. Simply put alot of people want a change and the Republicans are going to be hurt by that. In particular in Congress where the Dems will likely roll to big wins in both branches.
Fixed for truth.Brent wrote:i'm going to take her doggy style
Huh? <scratching a$$, sniffin' finger>Roody wrote:Kinda hard to do something when you don't have the numbers to actually do something. Just being in the majority doesn't mean you can do much. You have to have the numbers to avoid filibusters. Dems don't have that.
No, it makes sense.Ken wrote:Huh? <scratching a$$, sniffin' finger>
Is it me or is this a bit contradictory?
...not having enough numbers, yet being a majority... <still sniffin' fingers>JBrazen wrote:No, it makes sense.
No it's a perfectly cromulent argument.Ken wrote:Huh? <scratching a$$, sniffin' finger>
Is it me or is this a bit contradictory?
It takes 60 votes in the Senate to avoid a filibuster. That means that even if the Dems have 55 they still need 5 Republicans to cross the aisle. That's why a party can be in the majority and yet still not have the numbers to truly make changes.Ken wrote:...not having enough numbers, yet being a majority... <still sniffin' fingers>
I couldn't agree more. The economy was in much better shape during Bill's terms than either of Daddy Bush or Baby Bush terms of recession, JMO.Brent wrote: and a term with Hillary will be like a term with Bill, and I didn't think he was that bad, plus I think we need a change, time for a democrat to be president (i think its good to go back and forth to bring in new perspectives), plus I like her stances on issues more than Obamas.
He is an author.Goliard wrote:What I want to know is where and how Obama came up with the 16 million dollars his tax returns say he has.
With only a 100,000 dollar salary for the last 6 years, before that a 65,000 dollar income as a state reprenative for very few years, and the only other paying job hes ever had was as a city alterman which doesn't pay squat.
Anyone besides me notice a pecular oder hovering in the background?
~poor orphan from the streets raised by grandma makes good and pundant of the downtrodden,, my big wide Irish a$$~