SG Broadband Community

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... lence.html

Obama comparing a mass murder to violence of Imus

and this guy wants to be president? You got to be kidding

I think the blog is a little over dramatic about putting those "violences" in the same category.

Hes just listing different types of violence.

Hes annoying to listen too. I dont like his tone with the verbal abuse and gun control talk about the automatic weapons ban.

He talks so slow, it could have been a 4 min clip if he didnt speak so slow and pause all the time.

Ghosthunter wrote:http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... lence.html

Obama comparing a mass murder to violence of Imus

and this guy wants to be president? You got to be kidding

Wow

You can spin with the best of them. You could probably spin this post into an anti-semitic, liberal, tree hugging, racist rant.

I didn't listen to the recording, I don't want to listen to any more bullshit US politics than I have to, but even just reading the blog post, it's quite clear he's not comparing anything. He's listing. You and your claims of comparison... sigh

Ghosthunter wrote:http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... lence.html

Obama comparing a mass murder to violence of Imus

and this guy wants to be president? You got to be kidding

That blog and those comments are scary.....there a lot of stupid people in this country.

YARDofSTUF wrote:I think the blog is a little over dramatic about putting those "violences" in the same category.

Hes just listing different types of violence.

Hes annoying to listen too. I dont like his tone with the verbal abuse and gun control talk about the automatic weapons ban.

He talks so slow, it could have been a 4 min clip if he didnt speak so slow and pause all the time.

I think you are the only one in this thread who actually listen to his speech

Yeah he talks so slow I dont get that

I also think it was wrong for him to use this mass murder tragedy his main focal point in his speech only a few hours after it happened.


Verbal Violence is his new keyword in regards to imus, sorry but i never heard of anything called verbal violence, and think it should not be in the same subject as this tragedy at VT

The term "verbal violence" has been around for a long time.

YARDofSTUF wrote:The term "verbal violence" has been around for a long time.

Not in the republican lexicon

Obama is a joke.......

Ghosthunter wrote:http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... lence.html

Obama comparing a mass murder to violence of Imus

and this guy wants to be president? You got to be kidding

He's irrelevant. Completely unelectible in the United States. As "progressive" as the liberal/left/democrats like to think they are, there is still to many in their ranks that will never vote for a black man(or a woman, white or black).

Xpunge wrote:He's irrelevant. Completely unelectible in the United States. As "progressive" as the liberal/left/democrats like to think they are, there is still to many in their ranks that will never vote for a black man(or a woman, white or black).

Your av =

Ghosthunter wrote:
Verbal Violence is his new keyword in regards to imus, sorry but i never heard of anything called verbal violence, and think it should not be in the same subject as this tragedy at VT

People will look into an event with their own perspective, taking out of it what they wish.

I don't think he talks slow, it is just a different style of speach than what you may be use to. But I get the feeling that his views on violence could be associated with typical human prejudice. I know using that word is gonna get me in trouble. Plz don't get upset but it is normal for a group of people any group to have some degree of prejudice towards others. I belive that may have been the underlying reason to some of what he said. I'll leave it at that.

knightmare wrote:Obama is a joke.......

not any more so than our current president.....it's shame this event is being politicized the way it is ...course i expected it

Not slow like a retard but he pauses all the time for no reason.


Like:

I would. Just like to...say that, I... feel... that... the, violence that we see, today, is a product of.... viedo games.

YARDofSTUF wrote:Not slow like a retard but he pauses all the time for no reason.


Like:

I would. Just like to...say that, I... feel... that... the, violence that we see, today, is a product of.... viedo games.

LMAO! Yeah, that's friggin annoying! It's like he's trying to extend his speeches, like in HS, when we'd double the character size on our papers, cuz we didn't have enough substance

Prey521 wrote:LMAO! Yeah, that's friggin annoying! It's like he's trying to extend his speeches, like in HS, when we'd double the character size on our papers, cuz we didn't have enough substance

So you don't mind the way Bush speaks? It's about the same way..

downhill wrote:So you don't mind the way Bush speaks? It's about the same way..

Same sentence for Bush:

I would just like to say. That I feel the uh the violinence, that we see today is a productification of, uh, visual games, uh ya.

obama is a nice man but he will not be the president. the next president is going to be thompson or romney.

so don't worry my fellow commies.

downhill wrote:So you don't mind the way Bush speaks? It's about the same way..

Not the same, he uses fillers, yes, but it's not as annoying as Obamas pauses.

A_COMMUNIST wrote:obama is a nice man but he will not be the president. the next president is going to be thompson or romney.

so don't worry my fellow commies.

Prey521 wrote:Not the same, he uses fillers, yes, but it's not as annoying as Obamas pauses.

Your right, it's even more annoying.

Look, its Communist man, YAY!

Prey521 wrote:Not the same, he uses fillers, yes, but it's not as annoying as Obamas pauses.

um, errr, duh and 'where's Cheney?' aren't 'fillers'

A_COMMUNIST wrote:obama is a nice man but he will not be the president. the next president is going to be thompson or romney.

so don't worry my fellow commies.

He lives!!!

downhill wrote:Your right, it's even more annoying.

I have to disagree with that.

YARDofSTUF wrote:I have to disagree with that.

Isn't America great. You can do that and still be wrong.

YARDofSTUF wrote:I have to disagree with that.

I agree with your disagreeance

downhill wrote:Isn't America great. You can do that and still be wrong.

Same to you. I can listen to Bush more than once and not cringe in mental pain, cuz I can laugh at him, nothing to laugh at with obama, its liek he went to the University of Gore with a major in speech.

They both sound like they smoked too much dope

YARDofSTUF wrote:Same to you. I can listen to Bush more than once and not cringe in metal pain, cuz I can laugh at him, nothign to laugh at with obama, its liek he went to the University of Gore with a major in speech.

LMMFAO!

YARDofSTUF wrote:Same to you. I can listen to Bush more than once and not cringe in mental pain, cuz I can laugh at him, nothing to laugh at with obama, its liek he went to the University of Gore with a major in speech.

Prey521 wrote:I agree with your disagreeance

YARDofSTUF wrote:I would. Just like to...say that, I... feel... that... the, violence that we see, today, is a product of.... viedo games.

Maybe he's just a massive, long-time William Shatner fan.

Shatner should obviously run for president.