Page 4 of 5

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:21 pm
by AceFireball
triniwasp wrote:The illegal war in Iraq is what is putting a drain on the govt. homie.
....... :rotfl: That is true, well the drainage part at least, too. Way to change the topic though, just stiiiir that pot ;)

Have a good one fellas

-Ace

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:44 pm
by Brent
triniwasp wrote:The illegal war in Iraq is what is putting a drain on the govt. homie.
lol what is a legal or illegal war?

think about it

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:45 pm
by Brent
Humboldt wrote:Will the real ignorant dumbass racist please stand up?
If he can say white people why can't I say black people or mexican people?

now who is the quote: "ignorant dumbass racist"

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:49 pm
by Debbie
Brent wrote:If he can say white people why can't I say black people or mexican people?

now who is the quote: "ignorant dumbass racist"
I am sure humby missed wee's post. :nod: Otherwise, he would have included it.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:51 pm
by CiscoKid
Brent wrote:lol what is a legal or illegal war?

think about it
A legal war is one with a formal declaration of war that's been ratified by all branches of government.

The reason that Vietnam will forever be called a "conflict is because there was no declaration of war.

to adress your other question, Wee can say white people because he infact, IS white

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:02 pm
by wee96
CiscoKid wrote: Wee can say white people because he infact, IS white
Yes, yes this is true. It was a joke obviously, but really everyone hates white people and were always considered the least cool, so I guess theres somewhat of a truth to it. If your not a minority, your one of those "white man" or "white boy" or "cracka" or "honkey" 's..

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:23 pm
by PI_is_good
triniwasp wrote:The illegal war in Iraq is what is putting a drain on the govt. homie.

Oh BOY! Next you'll be spouting on with "Bush lied, people died" tripe.



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance -- not even today -- of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The nerve agent VX is one of the most toxic ever developed.

13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The recent inspection find in the private home of a scientist of a box of some 3,000 pages of documents, much of it relating to the laser enrichment of uranium support a concern that has long existed that documents might be distributed to the homes of private individuals. ...we cannot help but think that the case might not be isolated and that such placements of documents is deliberate to make discovery difficult and to seek to shield documents by placing them in private homes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have mentioned the issue of anthrax to the Council on previous occasions and I come back to it as it is an important one.

Iraq has declared that it produced about 8,500 litres of this biological warfare agent, which it states it unilaterally destroyed in the summer of 1991. Iraq has provided little evidence for this production and no convincing evidence for its destruction.

There are strong indications that Iraq produced more anthrax than it declared, and that at least some of this was retained after the declared destruction date. It might still exist. Either it should be found and be destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision or else convincing evidence should be produced to show that it was, indeed, destroyed in 1991."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




It's your wonderful "Anybody but Bush", "Bush lied", "The war is illegal" type of loony liberal rhetoric that will keep the Democracts from regaining any type of control in near future elections.

Please, keep on blogging, chatting and communicating your views to mainstream middle of the road Americans. It's working like a charm.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:29 pm
by PI_is_good
CiscoKid wrote:.............. Wee can say white people because he infact, IS white
P.C. tripe!


Good thing I'm a wonderful American mix of African, European, North American Indian and some others.

Being a bastard is good.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 4:58 pm
by Debbie
PI_is_good wrote:P.C. tripe!


Good thing I'm a wonderful American mix of African, European, North American Indian and some others.

Being a bastard is good.
pics? :D

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:29 pm
by Brent
CiscoKid wrote:to adress your other question, Wee can say white people because he infact, IS white
that just doesn't make any sense

let me put it to you this way

if a black person said a white person was the worse thing in America, it wouldn't seem so bad

see where i'm going?

i know wee was joking, but in that joke I added to it to make a point


and about the war thing, war comes from the word warfare, look it up: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=warfare

the terms legal or illegal are irrelevant when it comes to war

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:05 pm
by Lefty
Brent wrote:that just doesn't make any sense

let me put it to you this way

if a black person said a white person was the worse thing in America, it wouldn't seem so bad

see where i'm going?

i know wee was joking, but in that joke I added to it to make a point


and about the war thing, war comes from the word warfare, look it up: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=warfare

the terms legal or illegal are irrelevant when it comes to war
BS, if a black person said white folks were the worst part of this country I would be all over thier ass. Period. Stop being a troll.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:12 pm
by YARDofSTUF
PI_is_good wrote:Oh BOY! Next you'll be spouting on with "Bush lied, people died" tripe.



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance -- not even today -- of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The nerve agent VX is one of the most toxic ever developed.

13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The recent inspection find in the private home of a scientist of a box of some 3,000 pages of documents, much of it relating to the laser enrichment of uranium support a concern that has long existed that documents might be distributed to the homes of private individuals. ...we cannot help but think that the case might not be isolated and that such placements of documents is deliberate to make discovery difficult and to seek to shield documents by placing them in private homes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have mentioned the issue of anthrax to the Council on previous occasions and I come back to it as it is an important one.

Iraq has declared that it produced about 8,500 litres of this biological warfare agent, which it states it unilaterally destroyed in the summer of 1991. Iraq has provided little evidence for this production and no convincing evidence for its destruction.

There are strong indications that Iraq produced more anthrax than it declared, and that at least some of this was retained after the declared destruction date. It might still exist. Either it should be found and be destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision or else convincing evidence should be produced to show that it was, indeed, destroyed in 1991."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




It's your wonderful "Anybody but Bush", "Bush lied", "The war is illegal" type of loony liberal rhetoric that will keep the Democracts from regaining any type of control in near future elections.

Please, keep on blogging, chatting and communicating your views to mainstream middle of the road Americans. It's working like a charm.



OMFG its an attack with quotes, a terrorist quote attack!!!!!



run!

code orange!


wait no, code raspberry red!


HES GOT A MOUSE!!!

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:58 pm
by PI_is_good
YARDofSTUF wrote:OMFG its an attack with quotes, a terrorist quote attack!!!!!



run!

code orange!


wait no, code raspberry red!


HES GOT A MOUSE!!!

Not a very good "attack the messenger not the message" tactic. I give you, at best, a D+. Try harder next time little Timmy.


Kinda liek saying, "oh noes he's got mommies computer again!"


By the way, when are you moving out of mommies house?

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:59 pm
by Brent
Lefty wrote:BS, if a black person said white folks were the worst part of this country I would be all over thier ass. Period. Stop being a troll.
You are missing the point I am making.

But I am sure others get it.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:03 pm
by downhill
dietPOOPsie wrote:Seems to have been taken off course about post #32. go figure?



rotflcopterlol



Nice bait. :thumb:
This one is bait....

Jr...how you been? Did you ever get married?

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:04 pm
by Sarahnn
Brent wrote:You are missing the point I am making.

But I am sure others get it.
The problem is, Brent, you are making your point at someone else's expense without their consent. That's all. I'm sure you are smart enough to make the same point another way. :)

If so, I suggest you do it now. :D

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:06 pm
by Brent
Sarahnn wrote:The problem is, Brent, you are making your point at someone else's expense without their consent.
That makes no sense.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:31 pm
by triniwasp
Brent wrote:If he can say white people why can't I say black people or mexican people?

now who is the quote: "ignorant dumbass racist"
U beeeeeeeeeeatch! :D

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:38 pm
by triniwasp
wee96 wrote:Yes, yes this is true. It was a joke obviously, but really everyone hates white people and were always considered the least cool, so I guess theres somewhat of a truth to it. If your not a minority, your one of those "white man" or "white boy" or "cracka" or "honkey" 's..
I disagree that everyone hates white people. I think people hate the fact that some white people don't own up to the legacy of genocide and oppression that comes with having a Western European backround. As well as the fact that the majority of the 1% Ultra Elite in this country (who just happen to be descended from Western Europeans) don't give a ratz azz about the plight of the impoverished, regardless of what color they are.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:43 pm
by triniwasp
PI_is_good wrote:Oh BOY! Next you'll be spouting on with "Bush lied, people died" tripe.



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance -- not even today -- of the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The nerve agent VX is one of the most toxic ever developed.

13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The recent inspection find in the private home of a scientist of a box of some 3,000 pages of documents, much of it relating to the laser enrichment of uranium support a concern that has long existed that documents might be distributed to the homes of private individuals. ...we cannot help but think that the case might not be isolated and that such placements of documents is deliberate to make discovery difficult and to seek to shield documents by placing them in private homes."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have mentioned the issue of anthrax to the Council on previous occasions and I come back to it as it is an important one.

Iraq has declared that it produced about 8,500 litres of this biological warfare agent, which it states it unilaterally destroyed in the summer of 1991. Iraq has provided little evidence for this production and no convincing evidence for its destruction.

There are strong indications that Iraq produced more anthrax than it declared, and that at least some of this was retained after the declared destruction date. It might still exist. Either it should be found and be destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision or else convincing evidence should be produced to show that it was, indeed, destroyed in 1991."

Dr. Hans Blix, Chief UN Weapons Inspector
Addressing the UN Security Council
January 27, 2003

http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusnews ... =354&sID=6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




It's your wonderful "Anybody but Bush", "Bush lied", "The war is illegal" type of loony liberal rhetoric that will keep the Democracts from regaining any type of control in near future elections.

Please, keep on blogging, chatting and communicating your views to mainstream middle of the road Americans. It's working like a charm.
I'm sure your on the lookout for flying elephants too. :D

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:45 pm
by triniwasp
Brent wrote:that just doesn't make any sense

let me put it to you this way

if a black person said a white person was the worse thing in America, it wouldn't seem so bad

see where i'm going?

i know wee was joking, but in that joke I added to it to make a point


and about the war thing, war comes from the word warfare, look it up: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=warfare

the terms legal or illegal are irrelevant when it comes to war
That is not true in today's world.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:45 pm
by Brent
I think all races have their share of people and organizations that ultimately separate the races instead of combing humans into one "human race".

I think maybe the only way that might ever happen for reals is if we encountered aliens out there, and we started having aliens living here on earth and humans living on alien planets. Then we might finally start to see ourselves as "The Human Race"

Other than that wild scenario I don't see it happening for a very long time, not as long as some organizations out there are still around with their mind track set in the past.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:46 pm
by triniwasp
PI_is_good wrote:Not a very good "attack the messenger not the message" tactic. I give you, at best, a D+. Try harder next time little Timmy.


Kinda liek saying, "oh noes he's got mommies computer again!"


By the way, when are you moving out of mommies house?
R U crazy? U just told Chewbaca he's going bald. :rotfl: :rotfl:

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:47 pm
by Brent
triniwasp wrote:That is not true in today's world.
all I know is black people can call white people any name and not get in trouble, but if a white person utters the N word all hell breaks loose, even though black people use it amongst themselves

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:52 pm
by triniwasp
Brent wrote:all I know is black people can call white people any name and not get in trouble, but if a white person utters the N word all hell breaks loose, even though black people use it amongst themselves
Brent there is a history to that word, even you cannot deny that.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:10 pm
by Loonatic
Brent, you wont win this argument. As strongly as we feel on this subject, the black supports n what not will always have an excuse.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:21 pm
by Izzo
...well, this thread is sure making a charge for the lead.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:37 pm
by downhill
Izzo wrote:...well, this thread is sure making a charge for the lead.
Agreed. Let's stay on topic. My original intent was to simply ask...What in your opinion is the worse thing going on in America.

I had no intention of it turning into a political, religious or a race thread.

There isn't any need to trash what anyone thinks this is but if your just going to throw out some type of general statement that you know full well will "incite" a response then don't bother. If....on the other hand it's something you feel that strongly about and you know it'll still cast a general feeling of "what-kind-of-crap-statement-is-that" then by all means but state why you also feel that way.

I'm addressing this to the race issue, which imho isn't the worse thing going on in America. Bad? Yes....as illustrated in some of your posts.

Thanks for taking the time to read this.

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:59 pm
by Brent
triniwasp wrote:Brent there is a history to that word, even you cannot deny that.
I never said there wasn't. Apparently, people would rather live in the past.

We will always be segregated if we keep living in the past.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:32 am
by Lefty
Brent wrote:I never said there wasn't. Apparently, people would rather live in the past.

We will always be segregated if we keep living in the past.
Brent why dont you say what you mean in a full detailed statement instead of the little one liners followed by you dont understand replies.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:18 pm
by tao_jones
Brent wrote:I never said there wasn't. Apparently, people would rather live in the past.

We will always be segregated if we keep living in the past.
They dont live in the pass. That word is still used in a derogatory manner today.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:48 pm
by Brent
tao_jones wrote:They dont live in the pass. That word is still used in a derogatory manner today.
The NAACP lives in the past.

They truely keep the races separate.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:31 pm
by CiscoKid
Brent wrote:The NAACP lives in the past.

They truely keep the races separate.
if it wasn't for the NAACP, segragation would still be in effect, most advancment in equal rights would NOT have happened, think about it

It's not so much the NAACP, more like those who say ALL mexicans, ALL blacks, all whatever else should be put on a boat and sent back where they came from

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:50 pm
by cyberskye
Brent wrote:The NAACP lives in the past.
Perhaps, but so do Christians, Jews, Muslims and members of most organized religions. NAACP isn't a religion, I know, but the parallels are there between social and religious activism.

This goes back to my post on the original question. We selectively apply logic when it suits our purposes. The rest of the time (or when life forces us to apply the logic to ourselves) we ignore it...

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:55 pm
by CiscoKid
cyberskye wrote:Perhaps, but so do Christians, Jews, Muslims and members of most organized religions. NAACP isn't a religion, I know, but the parallels are there between social and religious activism.

This goes back to my post on the original question. We selectively apply logic when it suits our purposes. The rest of the time (or when life forces us to apply the logic to ourselves) we ignore it...
More so when it comes to the Jewish people...they used the bible as a legitimate claim to Palistinian teritories after WWII

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:02 pm
by dietPOOPsie
downhill wrote:This one is bait....

Jr...how you been? Did you ever get married?
Well, Jr. isn't in my name, but it was a cool character in Dallas the TV show.
And yeah, me and the wife have been married now for over fifteen years. Did I miss sending you a invite? Or maybe I didn't get your RSVP? dunno.


But hey your doing good there Bobby E. O'l boy. keep on a trying!




Rofles

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:05 pm
by cyberskye
CiscoKid wrote:More so when it comes to the Jewish people...they used the bible as a legitimate claim to Palistinian teritories after WWII
I think it's pretty consistent across religions.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 4:06 pm
by dietPOOPsie
downhill wrote:Agreed. Let's stay on topic. My original intent was to simply ask...

Whats so funny about this is, you being the original architect of this thread, your the one to derail it as well. Your doing good there O'l top! Just a notch bettar then Brent the mod.





gut Lolssssz

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:12 pm
by jayyy
dietPOOPsie wrote:Whats so funny about this is, you being the original architect of this thread, your the one to derail it as well. Your doing good there O'l top! Just a notch bettar then Brent the mod.





gut Lolssssz

You've got a good memory for someone who's only supposed to have 10 posts on here.

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:51 pm
by Lefty
jayyy wrote:You've got a good memory for someone who's only supposed to have 10 posts on here.
Image :nod: