TTL vs RWIN

General discussion related to Cable Modems, DSL, Wireless, Fiber, Mobile Networks, Wireless ISPs, Satellite, or any other type of high-speed Internet connection, general issues and questions here. Review and discuss ISPs as well (AT&T / SBC, BellSouth, Bright House, CableOne, Charter, Comcast, Covad, Cox, Cablevision / Optimum Online, TMobile, Verizon FIOS, Shaw, Telus, Starlink, etc.)
Post Reply
pino
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:11 am

TTL vs RWIN

Post by pino »

Here the choose

Smaller RWIN with Bigger TTL Hops or

Bigger RWIN with Smaller TTL Hops ?

pino
User avatar
earthmofo
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Providence, RI USA

Post by earthmofo »

It doesn't matter.

TTL or Time To Live is the number of hops (servers) a packet can travel to it's destination before it's dropped.

RWIN determines how much data the receiving computer can get and is not dependent on TTL.
"A never ending quest for knowledge as with knowledge comes wisdom"

Main System running Windows XP Pro: Intel Celeron 2.4 Ghz, 1 Gig Ram, 2 80 gig WD 7200 rpm HD's, Radeon 9200 Pro, Envision EN9110 19" LCD Display, HP 9500 CD-RW, D-Link DFE-530TX+ PCI Adapter, D-Link DI-704P Router, Motorola SB5100 Cable Modem with Cox HSI
pino
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:11 am

Post by pino »

How the relation for speed ?

Because from TCP Op or DRTCP said you must set RWIN and TTL for optimized but we can't get really according to environment ?

pino
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

TTL is pretty much irrelevant to speed, RWIN has the most effect on speed and is based on your caps and possible latency. :) ;)
pino
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:11 am

Post by pino »

So for experiment we must set TTL to deffault (e.g 64 for Win98) and we only change RWIN ?

pino
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

You got it, RWIN has the most effect on your speed.
:) ;)
pino
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:11 am

Post by pino »

I'll try !

tnx , pino
User avatar
rmrucker
Posts: 896
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA, USA

Post by rmrucker »

You don't want TTL too low with a large RWIN -- there will be a critical point if your RWIN greatly exceeds your bandwidth.

Think about it. If you have a HUGE RWIN and small bandwidth, the packets will have left the server and will be sitting in limbo for a long time waiting to get through the narrow pipe. If they sit in limbo too long, TTL will be exceeded.
User avatar
SICMF
Posts: 3567
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Asphalt Wasteland

Post by SICMF »

Originally posted by rmrucker
You don't want TTL too low with a large RWIN -- there will be a critical point if your RWIN greatly exceeds your bandwidth.

Think about it. If you have a HUGE RWIN and small bandwidth, the packets will have left the server and will be sitting in limbo for a long time waiting to get through the narrow pipe. If they sit in limbo too long, TTL will be exceeded.


OK, What would be a good setting for a large RWIN like 3584000?
Bone, Brain, And Co*k
Silence For My Revelry
Post Reply